State v. . Brown

175 S.E. 116, 206 N.C. 747, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 305
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 20, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 175 S.E. 116 (State v. . Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Brown, 175 S.E. 116, 206 N.C. 747, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 305 (N.C. 1934).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

At the March Term, 1934, Forsyth Superior Court, the defendant herein, J ames Brown, was tried upon an indictment charging him with burglary in the first degree, C. S., 4232, which resulted in a conviction and sentence of death. From the judgment thus entered, the prisoner gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, and was allowed thirty days within which to make out and serve statement of ease on appeal, and the solicitor was given twenty days thereafter to prepare and file exceptions or countercase, but nothing has been done towards perfecting the appeal, and the time for serving statement of case on appeal has now expired. No bond was required as the prisoner *748 was granted the privilege of appealing in forma pauperis. S. v. Stafford, 203 N. C., 601, 166 S. E., 734.

The prisoner having failed to make out and serve his statement of case on appeal within the time allowed has lost the right to do so, and the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss must be allowed (S. v. Johnson, 205 N. C., 610), but this we do only after an examination of the record to see that no error appears on the face thereof, as the life of the prisoner is involved. S. v. Goldston, 201 N. C., 89, 158 S. E., 926.

No error appears on the face of the record. S. v. Edney, 202 N. C., 706, 164 S. E., 23; S. v. Hamlet, ante, 568.

Appeal dismissed.

SohencK, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Stovall
200 S.E. 426 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
State v. . Sermons
194 S.E. 469 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
State v. . Pressley
183 S.E. 416 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
State v. . McLeod
182 S.E. 713 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Allen
182 S.E. 140 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Dunlap
181 S.E. 275 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Williams
180 S.E. 663 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Sentell
179 S.E. 456 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Watson
179 S.E. 455 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Etheridge
178 S.E. 556 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Hooker
178 S.E. 75 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 S.E. 116, 206 N.C. 747, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-nc-1934.