State v. Cowart

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Cowart

762 So. 2d 527, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5464, 1999 WL 245876

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 28, 1999

DocketNo. 98-03185

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 762 So. 2d 527 (State v. Cowart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cowart, 762 So. 2d 527, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5464, 1999 WL 245876 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the sentence imposed. See State v. Cotton, 728 So.2d 251 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (trial court has responsibility to exercise sentencing discretion under the [528]*528Prison Releasee Reoffender Act). See also State v. Wise, 744 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We acknowledge and certify conflict with McKnight v. State, 727 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), and Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the sentence imposed. See State v. Cotton, 728 So.2d 251 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (trial court has responsibility to exercise sentencing discretion under the [528]*528Prison Releasee Reoffender Act). See also State v. Wise, 744 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We acknowledge and certify conflict with McKnight v. State, 727 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), and Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

762 So. 2d 527, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5464, 1999 WL 245876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cowart-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack