State v. Forde

742 So. 2d 349, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10703, 1999 WL 596939
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 11, 1999·No. No. 98-04495·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the sentence imposed. See State v. Cotton, 728 So.2d 251 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)(holding that the trial court has discretion to determine whether a defendant should be sentenced as a Prison Re-leasee Reoffender under the Prison Re-leasee Reoffender Act). See also Coleman v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1324, 739 So.2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); State v. Cowart, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1085, - So.2d -, 1999 WL 245876 (Fla. 2d DCA Apr. 28, 1999); State v. Wise, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D657, 744 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We acknowledge and certify conflict with Woods v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D831, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), and McKnight v. State, 727 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Forde, 742 So. 2d 349, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10703, 1999 WL 596939 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

742 So. 2d 349 (State v. Forde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Forde
762 So. 2d 520 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)