McKnight v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McKnight v. State

725 So. 2d 1254, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 937, 1999 WL 44057

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 3, 1999

DocketNo. 97-00705

StatusPublished

This text of 725 So. 2d 1254 (McKnight v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKnight v. State, 725 So. 2d 1254, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 937, 1999 WL 44057 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PATTERSON, Acting Chief Judge.

Jimmy MeKnight appeals from the fifteen-year sentence imposed upon him following the revocation of his community control. We affirm the revocation and the sentence imposed, but remand for the entry of a written order.

The trial court specifically stated on the record that MeKnight violated conditions 3, 9, and 10; however, it failed to enter a written order. Therefore, we remand for the entry of a written order that conforms to the oral pronouncement. See Green v. State, 709 So.2d 1390 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Thames v. State, 709 So.2d 650 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Remich v. State, 696 So.2d 1270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

We do not reach McKnight’s argument that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. This issue must be raised in a postconviction motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Affirmed in part; remanded for entry of a written order.

BLUE and GREEN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI