State v. Damico

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Damico

742 So. 2d 349, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10704, 1999 WL 596936

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 11, 1999

DocketNo. 98-03904

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 742 So. 2d 349 (State v. Damico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Damico, 742 So. 2d 349, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10704, 1999 WL 596936 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the sentence imposed. See State v. Cotton, 728 So.2d 251 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)(holding that the trial court has discretion to determine whether a defendant should be sentenced as a Prison Re-[350]*350leasee Reoffender under the Prison Re-leasee Reoffender Act). See also Coleman v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1324, 739 So.2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); State v. Cowart, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1085, 740 So.2d 20, 1999 WL 245876 (Fla. 2d DCA Apr.28, 1999); State v. Wise, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D657, 740 So.2d 20, 1999 WL 123568 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar.10, 1999). We acknowledge and certify conflict with Woods v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D831, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), and McKnight v. State, 727 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the sentence imposed. See State v. Cotton, 728 So.2d 251 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)(holding that the trial court has discretion to determine whether a defendant should be sentenced as a Prison Re-[350]*350leasee Reoffender under the Prison Re-leasee Reoffender Act). See also Coleman v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1324, 739 So.2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); State v. Cowart, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1085, 740 So.2d 20, 1999 WL 245876 (Fla. 2d DCA Apr.28, 1999); State v. Wise, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D657, 740 So.2d 20, 1999 WL 123568 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar.10, 1999). We acknowledge and certify conflict with Woods v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D831, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), and McKnight v. State, 727 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

742 So. 2d 349, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10704, 1999 WL 596936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-damico-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack