State v. Conrad

Idaho Supreme Court

State v. Conrad

663 P.2d 1101, 104 Idaho 799, 1983 Ida. LEXIS 448

CourtIdaho Supreme Court

DecidedMay 19, 1983

DocketNo. 14536

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 663 P.2d 1101 (State v. Conrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Conrad, 663 P.2d 1101, 104 Idaho 799, 1983 Ida. LEXIS 448 (Idaho 1983).

Pincite

Opinions

HUNTLEY, Justice.

This appeal is from a decision of the District Court holding that the requirement of I.C. § 19-3501(2) that prosecutions or indictments be dismissed if the defendant is not brought to trial within six months is not applicable to misdemeanor cases initiated by complaint.

We affirm for the reasons set forth in the well-reasoned and comprehensive analysis set forth in the Memorandum Decision of the District Judge, Bingham County Case no. 3037, filed February 22, 1982.

DONALDSON, C.J., and SHEPARD and BAKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HUNTLEY, Justice.

This appeal is from a decision of the District Court holding that the requirement of I.C. § 19-3501(2) that prosecutions or indictments be dismissed if the defendant is not brought to trial within six months is not applicable to misdemeanor cases initiated by complaint.

We affirm for the reasons set forth in the well-reasoned and comprehensive analysis set forth in the Memorandum Decision of the District Judge, Bingham County Case no. 3037, filed February 22, 1982.

DONALDSON, C.J., and SHEPARD and BAKES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

663 P.2d 1101, 104 Idaho 799, 1983 Ida. LEXIS 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-conrad-idaho-1983.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack