State v. Clonch

89 S.E.2d 469, 242 N.C. 760, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 683
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 19, 1955
Docket289
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 89 S.E.2d 469 (State v. Clonch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Clonch, 89 S.E.2d 469, 242 N.C. 760, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 683 (N.C. 1955).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant presents for decision two assignments:

First, the one based upon exception to the refusal of the court to admit evidence relating to the issue of paternity. The exception is without merit! The judgment of the Recorder’s Court in this respect is res judicata. See S. v. Robinson, 236 N.C. 408, 72 S.E. 2d 857; also G.S. 49-7; S. v. Clement, 230 N.C. 614, 54 S.E. 2d 919.

And, second, the one based upon exception to the charge:

This exception is well taken. It would seem that the language used is too unequivocal. Ordinarily it is permissible for the court to charge that if the jury finds the facts to be as the evidence tends to show beyond a reasonable doubt to return a verdict of guilty; otherwise not guilty.

For error thus committed, there must be a

New trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tidwell v. Booker
225 S.E.2d 816 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1976)
Tidwell v. Booker
219 S.E.2d 648 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)
State v. Green
176 S.E.2d 756 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1970)
State v. Smith
97 S.E.2d 442 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E.2d 469, 242 N.C. 760, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-clonch-nc-1955.