State v. Clement
54 S.E.2d 919, 230 N.C. 614, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 389
Opinion
Perhaps the case would be controlled by the decision in S. v. Hiatt (1937), 211 N.C. 116, 189 S.E. 124, where an attempted appeal from a similar verdict was dismissed, but for the 1947 amendment to the statute which specifically allows an appeal “from a finding of the issue of paternity against the defendant.” Chap. 1014, Session Laws 1947; G-.S. 49-7. This amendment seems not to have been called to the judge’s attention. Error is confessed.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Clement, 54 S.E.2d 919, 230 N.C. 614, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 389 (N.C. 1949).
54 S.E.2d 919 (State v. Clement) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Green
176 S.E.2d 756 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1970)
State v. Coffey
164 S.E.2d 39 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1968)
State v. Clonch
89 S.E.2d 469 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)