State v. Smith

97 S.E.2d 442, 246 N.C. 118, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 361
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 17, 1957·No. 437·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER Curiam.

The warrant is fatally defective in that it does not charge that defendant wilfully neglected or refused to support and maintain his illegitimate child, an essential allegation in a criminal prosecution under G.S. 49-2; and, as frankly conceded by the Attorney-General, the judgment must be arrested on authority of S. v. Coppedge, 244 N.C. 590, 94 S.E. 2d 569, and cases cited therein.

However, the statute, as interpreted by this Court, creates a continuing offense. S. v. Coppedge, supra, and cases cited therein.

As to the significance of the finding made 2 July, 1953, in the Domestic Relations Court, that “this defendant is the father of Leonard Lee *120 Jones, see S. v. Clonch, 242 N.C. 760, 89 S.E. 2d 469, and S. v. Robinson, 245 N.C. 10, 15, 95 S.E. 2d 126.

Judgment arrested.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 97 S.E.2d 442, 246 N.C. 118, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 361 (N.C. 1957).

97 S.E.2d 442 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Green
176 S.E.2d 756 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1970)