Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Campbell

State v. Campbell

783 N.E.2d 519, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1459
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 19, 2003
Docket2003-0045
StatusPublished

This text of 783 N.E.2d 519 (State v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Campbell, 783 N.E.2d 519, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1459 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-010727, 2002-Ohio-6064. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Entry Granting Motion to Certify Conflict dated December 9, 2002:

“Whether the amendment of the charging instrument from one subsection of R.C. 4511.19 to another subsection of R.C. 4511.19 changes the name and identify of the crime charged in violation of Ohio Criminal Rule 7(D)?”

F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case in State v. Marinik (1989), 57 Ohio App.3d 110, 567 N.E.2d 310.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Marinik
567 N.E.2d 310 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
783 N.E.2d 519, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-campbell-ohio-2003.