State v. Bramble

121 N.C. 603
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 15, 1897·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The affidavit to appeal in forma pauperis is fatally defective, as it omits the averment that - it is “made in good faith,” which is required by The Code, Section 1235. The appeal must ho dismissed as a matter of right, not of discretion. State v. Harris, 114 N. C., 830; State v. Rhodes, 112 N. C., 856; State v. Jackson, Ibid, 849; State v. Shoulders, 111 N. C., 637; State v. Wylde, 110 N. C, 500; State v. Tow, 103 N. C., 350; State v. Moore, 93 N. C., 500; State v. Payne, Ibid, 612; State v. Jones, Ibid, 617; State v. Morgan, 77 N. C., 510; State v. Divine, 69 N. C., 390.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bramble, 121 N.C. 603 (N.C. 1897).

121 N.C. 603 (State v. Bramble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Parish
65 S.E. 762 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)
Honeycutt v. Watkins
65 S.E. 762 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)
State v. . Keebler
59 S.E. 872 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1907)
State v. Atkinson.
53 S.E. 228 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1906)