State v. . Rhodes

16 S.E. 930, 112 N.C. 856
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 5, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 16 S.E. 930 (State v. . Rhodes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Rhodes, 16 S.E. 930, 112 N.C. 856 (N.C. 1893).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The right to appeal in forma pauperis requires some restrictions against abuse. What thej” shall be is for the Legislature to determine ; it has set out the requirements in The Code, §1235. The Court has no right to abrogate any of these requisites. This has been often *857 decided. State v. Jackson, at this Term; State v. Wylde, 110 N. C., 500; State v. Tow, 103 N. C, 350; State v. Jones, 93 N. C., 617; and, indeed, in a full score of cases.

The present case presents an affidavit which lacks the statutory requirement of an averment “of good faith.” The appellant has not done what was requisite to place his appeal before us. We cannot help him, and the attempted appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Smith
67 S.E. 965 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
State v. Bramble
121 N.C. 603 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)
S. v. . Bramble
28 S.E. 269 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)
State v. . Harris
19 S.E. 154 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 S.E. 930, 112 N.C. 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rhodes-nc-1893.