State v. . Tow

9 S.E. 411, 103 N.C. 350
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 5, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 9 S.E. 411 (State v. . Tow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Tow, 9 S.E. 411, 103 N.C. 350 (N.C. 1889).

Opinion

Smith, C. J.

The charge against the defendant is for selling spirituous liquors in the county of Yancey, a territory in which a popular vote has been taken and declared to be in favor of prohibition, according to the provisions of chapter 32 of volume 2 of The Code.

After conviction and judgment the defendant obtained leave of the Judge, upon his affidavit of inability, to give secui’ity or make a money deposit, upon an appeal, to take the appeal in forma pauperis, and the transcript of the record has been brought to this Court.

Upon examination, the affidavit, which is sent up, is found to be fatally defective, in failing to state “that the application is in good faith.” This is essential to its sufficiency to sustain the appeal in criminal causes, under section 1235 of The Code, as determined in State v. Payne, 93 N. C., 612; State v. Jones, ibid., 617.

The motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal must be allowed. Had the record simply stated the allowance of the appeal unaccompanied with the affidavit of the defendant and the certificate of counsel, we should have proceeded to hear, assuming that the leave granted was rightful and proper, based upon sufficient grounds, on the maxim, “ Omnia rite presumuntur.” State v. Jones, supra.

The counsel for the defendant seems, in preparing the paper to enable him to prosecute his appeal without giving security, to have followed the provisions of sections 552 and *352 553, which relate to appeals in civil cases and do not require the averment of good faith, the omission of which is a fatal defect in the affidavit in criminal cases, not adverting -to-section 1235.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Smith
67 S.E. 965 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
State v. Bramble
121 N.C. 603 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)
S. v. . Bramble
28 S.E. 269 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)
State v. . Wylde
15 S.E. 5 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 S.E. 411, 103 N.C. 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tow-nc-1889.