S. v. . Bramble

28 S.E. 269, 121 N.C. 603
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 5, 1897·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The affidavit to appeal in forma pauperis is fatally defective, as it omits the averment that it is "made in good faith," which is required by the Code, sec. 1235. The appeal must be dismissed as a matter of right, not of discretion. S. v. Harris, 114 N.C. 830; S. v. Rhodes, 112 N.C. 856;S. v. Jackson, ib., 849; S. v. Shoulders, 111 N.C. 637; S. v. Wylde,110 N.C. 500; S. v. Tow, 103 N.C. 350; S. v. Moore, 93 N.C. 500; S. v.Payne, ib., 612; S. v. Jones, ib., 617; S. v. Morgan, 77 N.C. 510; S. v.Divine, 69 N.C. 390.

Appeal dismissed.

Cited: S. v. Atkinson, 141 N.C. 735; S. v. Keebler, 145 N.C. 562;Honeycutt v. Watkins, 151 N.C. 653; S. v. Parish, ib., 659; S. v. Smith,152 N.C. 842; S. v. DeVane, 166 N.C. 283.

(604)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S. v. . Bramble, 28 S.E. 269, 121 N.C. 603 (N.C. 1897).

28 S.E. 269 (S. v. . Bramble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Stafford
166 S.E. 734 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
State v. . Marion
158 S.E. 158 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Waters v. . Boyd
102 S.E. 196 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1920)
State v. . Martin
90 S.E. 502 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)
State v. . Devane
81 S.E. 293 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)
State v. . Smith
67 S.E. 965 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
Honeycutt v. . Watkins
65 S.E. 762 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)