State v. . Parish

65 S.E. 762, 151 N.C. 659, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 338
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 13, 1909·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam :

The defendant attempted to appeal in forma pauperis. The affidavits were such as required by the statute (Revisal, sec. 3278), but the order allowing the appeal without giving bond was not signed by the judge, as required by Revisal, sec. 3279, but by the clerk. This latter is allowable only as to appeals in civil cases. Revisal, sec. 597.

Unless the requirements of the statute, both as to time and manner, are complied with, the appeal is not in this Court. The defect is jurisdictional, and we have no power to allow amendments, and the appellee has a right to have the appeal dismissed. State v. Bramble, 121 N. C., 603; State v. Galewood, 125 N. C., 695, and numerous cases there cited.

The defendant, however, when the case was called, asked to be considered as ajjpealing under bond, and to make the deposit *660 now, in lieu of bond, in this Court, as allowed by Revisal, sec. 593, if “good cause is shown.” We think such cause has been shown, and, the deposit in lieu of bond having been made, the case will be heard. 'As, under the circumstances, the record and brief have not been printed, the cause will be set for hearing at the close of the call of causes from the Eighth District, that the printing may be done, as required in all except pauper appeals.

Motion allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Parish, 65 S.E. 762, 151 N.C. 659, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 338 (N.C. 1909).

65 S.E. 762 (State v. . Parish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Holland
189 S.E. 761 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
Powell v. . Moore
169 S.E. 281 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
State v. . Stafford
166 S.E. 734 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
State v. . Smith
67 S.E. 965 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)