State v. Boado
55 S.W.3d 621, 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 74, 2001 WL 1090520
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 19, 2001
DocketNo. 167-00
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases
This text of 55 S.W.3d 621 (State v. Boado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Boado, 55 S.W.3d 621, 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 74, 2001 WL 1090520 (Tex. 2001).
Opinions
OPINION
The opinion was delivered
Appellee was indicted for bribery. She filed a motion to quash the indictment, which the trial court granted. The State appealed. The Court of Appeals reversed.1
Having examined the record and considered the arguments in the case, we conclude that our decision to grant review was improvident. Appellee’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Simmons, Kaylen Dewayne
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Simmons, Kaylen Dewayne
Texas Supreme Court, 2015
Kerry Bernard Laurent v. State
454 S.W.3d 650 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014)
State v. Rhinehart
333 S.W.3d 154 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2011)
State of Texas v. Rhinehart, Kenton Jerrod
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2011
State v. Jason Meadows
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005
State v. Meadows
170 S.W.3d 617 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Woods v. State
153 S.W.3d 413 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Woods, George Deshawn
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005
State v. Seibert
156 S.W.3d 32 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)
State v. Kurtz
111 S.W.3d 315 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
55 S.W.3d 621, 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 74, 2001 WL 1090520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boado-texcrimapp-2001.