State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas (United States, Intervener)

265 U.S. 500, 44 S. Ct. 573, 68 L. Ed. 1121, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 3081
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 9, 1924·No. 15 ORIG·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

265 U.S. 500

44 S.Ct. 573

68 L.Ed. 1121

STATE OF OKLAHOMA
v.
STATE OF TEXAS (UNITED STATES, Intervener).

No. ___.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 9, 1924

Perhaps the most impressive prerogative of the United States Supreme Court is its jurisdiction over controversies between states. Eliminating the necessity of diplomacy, and perchance a resort to the final arbitrament of war, the highest judicial tribunal of this country has during this litigation exercised its jurisdiction over this disputed area and frustrated occasion to employ the sword. The following resume of the various opinions, orders, and decrees will in a measure serve to indicate the diligence and perspicacity with which court and counsel and others engaged in determining the controversy have pursued the task to final determination:

April 1, 1920:

Order granting motion of the United States for leave to intervene for an injunction and for the appointment of a receiver; order granting injunction and appointing Jacob M. Dickinson receiver, also other matters. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 252 U. S. 372, 40 Sup. Ct. 353, 64 L. Ed. 619.

April 13, 1920:

Frederic A. Delano appointed receiver, vice Jacob M. Dickinson declined. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 252 U. S. 372, 40 Sup. Ct. 394, 64 L. Ed. 619.

June 7, 1920:

Motions of Judsonia Developing Association and others for leave to file petitions in intervention, granted. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 40 Sup. Ct. 580.

Order instructing receiver. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 253 U. S. 465, 40 Sup. Ct. 580, 64 L. Ed. 1015, 1017.

Order setting cause for hearing upon certain questions of law. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 40 Sup. Ct. 582.

Order setting cause for hearing upon certain questions and appointing Ernest Knaebel commissioner. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 40 Sup. Ct. 585.

Leave granted Judsonia Developing Association and others to file intervening petitions. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 40 Sup. Ct. 585.

October 18, 1920:

Motion of E. Everett Rowell for leave to intervene granted. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 254 U. S. 609, 41 Sup. Ct. 12, 65 L. Ed. 436.

November 8, 1920:

Third report of receiver filed. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 41 Sup. Ct. 60.

December 6, 1920:

Order authorizing receiver to make certain payments for services. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 254 U. S. 615, 41 Sup. Ct. 146, 65 L. Ed. 439.

Order directing return to General Oil Company one certain well. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 254 U. S. 280, 41 Sup. Ct. 146, 65 L. Ed. 270.

January 18, 1921:

Fourth report of receiver filed. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 41 Sup. Ct. 218.

January 24, 1921:

Motion of Sinclair Oil & Gas Company to require receiver to refund proceeds from oil wells denied. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 254 U. S. 603, 41 Sup. Ct. 317, 65 L. Ed. 434.

Petition of Oklahoma Petroleum & Gasoline Company, requiring receiver to file statement of expenses and pay proceeds of certain oil wells, denied. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 254 U. S. 603, 41 Sup. Ct. 317, 65 L. Ed. 434.

Motion of C. J. Benson and others to require receiver to file inventory of equipment purchased and to file statement of moneys charged against and realized from certain wells denied. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 254 U. S. 604, 41 Sup. Ct. 318.

Order directing return to Southwest Petroleum Company, one well. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 254 U. S. 604, 41 Sup. Ct. 318.

Leave granted to submit response of United States to motion of Southwest Petroleum Company and to motion of Sinclair

Oil & Gas Company. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 41 Sup. Ct. 318.

Motion of General Oil Company to set aside and amend decree submitted. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 41 Sup. Ct. 318.

Motion of National Petroleum & Refining Company for return of patented lands submitted. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 41 Sup. Ct. 318.

Motion of T. P. Roberts and another for return of patented lands submitted. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 41 Sup. Ct. 319.

Motion of T. P. Roberts and another to require receiver to pay to them certain moneys submitted. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 41 Sup. Ct. 319.

Motion of Continental Oil Company for leave to intervene submitted. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 41 Sup. Ct. 319.

Motion of Continental Oil Company to direct receiver to protect lands submitted. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 41 Sup. Ct. 319.

April 11, 1921:

Opinion deciding questions set for hearing in State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 40 Sup. Ct. 582; State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 256 U. S. 70, 41 Sup. Ct. 420, 65 L. Ed. 831.

May 2, 1921:

Motion of John M. Taylor et al. for leave to intervene denied. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 41 Sup. Ct. 536.

June 1, 1921:

Orders made regarding: Application of Pearson et al; Claim of Eoff; Claim of Armstrong et af.; instructions to receiver; order setting intervening petitions for hearing; order to show cause why writ of prohibition should not be issued; reimbursement of operators and drillers; order setting cause for further hearing; order as to filing of petitions in intervention. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 256 U. S. 602, 41 Sup. Ct. 539, 65 L. Ed. 1114, 1118.

Order authorizing receiver to sink well. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 256 U. S. 602, 41 Sup. Ct. 621, 65 L. Ed. 1114, 1118.

Order authorizing receiver to sink a well. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 256 U. S. 602, 41 Sup. Ct. 622, 65 L. Ed. 1114, 1118.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas (United States, Intervener), 265 U.S. 500, 44 S. Ct. 573, 68 L. Ed. 1121, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 3081 (1924).

265 U.S. 500 (State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas (United States, Intervener)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turner v. Mullins
162 S.W.3d 356 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Brainard v. State
12 S.W.3d 6 (Texas Supreme Court, 2000)
Edward J. Simons v. Jerry Vinson and A. P. Clark
394 F.2d 732 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
Thomas Jordan, Inc. v. Skelly Oil Company
296 S.W.2d 279 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1956)
Diversion Lake Club v. Heath
86 S.W.2d 441 (Texas Supreme Court, 1935)