The State of Oklahoma v. The State of Texas

257 U.S. 616
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 7, 1921
Docket20, original
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 257 U.S. 616 (The State of Oklahoma v. The State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The State of Oklahoma v. The State of Texas, 257 U.S. 616 (1921).

Opinion

257 U.S. 616

42 S.Ct. 94

66 L.Ed. 399

The STATE OF OKLAHOMA, complainant,
v.
The STATE OF TEXAS.

No. 20, original.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 21, 1921

Mr. S. P. Freeling, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for the State of Oklahoma.

Messrs. C. W. Taylor, of Corsicana, Tex., Orville Bullington and A. H. Carrigan, both of Wichita Falls, Tex., and C. M. Cureton and W. A. Keeling, both of Austin, Tex., and T. W. Gregory, of Washington, D. C., for the State of Texas.

Order.

The receiver is hereby authorized to make the following payments and to charge the same as expenses of the receivership:

To Nagel & Kirby the sum of six thousand dollars as compensation for services rendered by them between December 6, 1920, and this date;

To McKinney & Flannery the sum of fifteen thousand dollars as compensation for services rendered by them for the year following December 6, 1920;

And to Frederic A. Delano the sum of thirty-five thousand dollars on account of his services as receiver.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 U.S. 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-state-of-oklahoma-v-the-state-of-texas-scotus-1921.