Oklahoma v. Texas

256 U.S. 602, 41 S. Ct. 540, 65 L. Ed. 1114, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1593
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 1, 1921·No. 23·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

ORDERS AND INTERLOCUTORY DECREE ENTERED

Directing the Receiver to sink an oil and gas well on land claimed by Pearson et ah, with provisions, as. to expenses, operation, and disposition of proceeds.

Upon application of A. E. Pearson, R. R. Bell, Susie Shaw, Georgia Darby, Mrs. John Mounts, Henry G. Beard, and the Silver Moon Oil Company, claimants of certain tracts or parcels of land purchased by Fred Capshaw from the United States of America under patent .dated February 17, 1920;

It is ordered that the Receiver be and he is hereby authorized and directed to sink a well for oil and gas upon the- land described, in said patent at such place as the Receiver shall select, provided said applicants shall pay in advancé from time to. time as required the cost and expense of sinking the same and bringing .it into production. The said well shall be operated by the Receiver as he operates wells on other lands in the river-bed. area, and he shall conserve and dispose of the proceeds of the oil and gas as in the case of wélls on other lands in the river-bed area, and shall • reimburse the said Pearson, et al., out, of the net proceeds for-- the moneys so advanced and, paid by them for drilling, the well aiid bringing it into production; the remainder of such proceeds to be retained by hiin subject to the order -of the court. ."

*603 Directing the Receiver to sink an'oil and gas well on land claimed by Eóff, with provisions as to expenses, operation, and disposition of proceeds.

Upon motion of Luther Eoff, claiming to be owner, of an oil and gas lease upon a certain tract of 500 acres of land described in his motion, situate on the. flood plain on the south side of Red River, in Range 15 West;

It is ordered that the Receiver be and he is hereby authorized and directed to sink a well for oil and gas upon the land described in said motion at such place as the Receiver shall select, provided said applicant shall pay in advance from time to time as required the cost and expense of sinking the same and bringing it into production. The said well shall be operated by the Receiver as he operates wells on lands in the river-bed area, and he shall conserve and dispose of the proceeds of the oil and gas as in the case of wells on lands in the river-bed area, and shall reimburse the said Eoff out of the net proceeds for the moneys so advanced and pai’d by him for drilling the well and bringing it into production; the remainder of such proceeds to be retained by the Receiver subject to. the order of the court.

Appointing a Special Master to hear and report upon claims of Armstrong, et al., to certain moneys held by the Receiver.

Upon motion of J. R. Armstrong, et al., and upon the assent of the Receiver, it appearing that the Receiver hast in his 'hands a fund--of approximately Fifty thousand dollars, being part of the proceeds derived by him from the production of Receiver’s Wells Nos. 157,162, and 170, operated by him for said Armstrong and for one C. J. Benson, under whom he claims by assignment;

It is ordered that Frederick S. Tyler, Esq., be and he is hereby appointed a special master to hear and report to - this court for determination the claim of said J. R. Arm *604 strong to have said fund turned over to him as purchaser of said wells; and said master shall hear and report on said claim and on all other claims that may be presented against said fund.

Said master shall have authority to issue process of subpoena to compel the attendance of witnesses, and it shall be his duty to give notice to all parties concerned, to fix the time and place of hearing, and adjourn the. same from time to time if necessary; and he shall report all the evidence taken, together with his findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation in the premises, for the ultimate consideration and action of this court.

If for any reason the said Frederick S. Tyler, Esq., shall be unable, to act as such special master, or to complete his duties as such, a special master to act in his place shall be named by the Chief Justice or the senior. Associate Justice of this Court.

Limiting development work, and directing the Receiver to collect, withhold and impound part of gross proceeds of gas, advertise for, examine and settle claims, and make report of those unsettled.

Upon considering the Fifth Report of the Receiver, filed herein May 26, 1921, it is ordered:

(1) That until further order all development work by the Receiver (except as prescribed in certain other orders made this day) shall be . confined to the completion of the wells in the river-bed area, about twelve in number, work upon which already has been begun.

(2) That the Receiver be and he is hereby authorized and directed to collect, withhold, and impound three-sixteenths of the gross proceeds of gas produced by wells within the receivership area from and after June 1, 1921.

(3) That the Receiver be and he is hereby authorized to publish a notice in four daily newspapers, two circulating in Texas and two circulating in Oklahoma, to be *605 selected by him, requesting all persons having claims against the Receiver or . against the property or funds in his custody to present the same to the Receiver within 60 days from the date of publication of such notice, accompanying their statements of claim with supporting affidavits and certifiéd or sworn copies Of any documentary evidence upon which they may rely; and the Receiver is directed to examine and investigate said claims and supporting evidence, and he is hereby authorized to settle and discharge the same if he can do so upon a fair and equitable basis; and as to any not so adjusted and settled he shall make a full- report to this court at its next Term fot- such further actio'n as the court may deem proper.

Setting down cause for hearing on special issues raised between the United States and private parties claiming riparian land on the north bank of Red River, and placer mining locations, and between Oklahoma and the United States concerning school sections; and on the claims of all other interveners claiming lands on north bank or placer mining locations; and appointing a commissioner to take and report evidence.

It appearing that special issues have been joined in this cause (1) upon the intervening • petition of E. Everitt Rowell, claimant of riparian land on the north bank of Red River, and the answer thereto of the United States embodied in Paragraph II of its amended petition of intervention; (2) upon the intervening petition of A. E. Peárson, R. R. Bell, Susie Shaw, Georgia Darby, Mrs. John Mounts, Henry G. Beard,, and the Silver Moon Oil Company, claimants of riparian lands on north bank of Red River, and the answer thereto of the United States embodied in Paragraph II of its amended petition of'intervention; (3) upon the amended petition of intervention of the Burk Divide Oil Company (Consolidated) and others, placer mining claimants, and the answer of thé *606

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oklahoma v. Texas, 256 U.S. 602, 41 S. Ct. 540, 65 L. Ed. 1114, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1593 (1921).

256 U.S. 602 (Oklahoma v. Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edward J. Simons v. Jerry Vinson and A. P. Clark
394 F.2d 732 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
United States v. California
332 U.S. 19 (Supreme Court, 1947)
Abraham v. Wichita Petroleum Co.
50 F.2d 771 (Fifth Circuit, 1931)
Rector v. United States
20 F.2d 845 (Eighth Circuit, 1927)
West v. Work
11 F.2d 828 (District of Columbia, 1926)
Oklahoma v. Texas
258 U.S. 574 (Supreme Court, 1922)