State Ex Rel. Baker v. Cook

16 P.3d 1184, 171 Or. App. 719, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 2131
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided December 27, 2000·No. 00C-10592; CA A110010·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

*720 PER CURIAM

Plaintiff, a prisoner at the Snake River Correctional Institution, appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus. We write only to discuss the court’s action in requiring him, as part of the judgment of dismissal, to pay filing fees of $167; it had previously deferred payment of those fees. The state concedes that the trial court erred, and we agree.

When plaintiff filed his petition, he attached an Affidavit of Indigency, in which he stated that: he had $22.48 in a Department of Corrections trust account; he had no net income over the previous 12 months; he had no other money on hand or in savings; and he owned no real or personal property. Based on that affidavit, the trial court deferred the initial payment of fees. There was no further information about plaintiffs financial situation in the record when the trial court later dismissed the case.

ORS 21.605(l)(a) gives a trial court authority to defer or waive fees if it finds that a party is unable to pay them. In Stanwood v. Multnomah County, 135 Or App 58, 61, 898 P2d 196 (1995), we held that a trial court abused its discretion when it denied a motion to waive the initial filing fees for an indigent prisoner. The same principle applies to the imposition of those fees as part of a final judgment. Nothing in the record suggests that plaintiff is or will be capable of paying the filing fees, and it was an abuse of discretion to impose them as part of the judgment.

Judgment for filing fees of $167 reversed; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Baker v. Cook, 16 P.3d 1184, 171 Or. App. 719, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 2131 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

16 P.3d 1184 (State Ex Rel. Baker v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Dept. of Corrections (A170818)
496 P.3d 1073 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)
Bohanan v. Amsberry
444 P.3d 515 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2019)
Smith v. STATE EX REL. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
220 P.3d 444 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
Smith v. State
220 P.3d 444 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
State ex rel. Smith v. Curths
169 P.3d 1277 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
Roy v. Palmateer
95 P.3d 1124 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)
State ex rel. Haydon v. Kliewer
74 P.3d 1110 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2003)
State Ex Rel. Osborne v. Cook
59 P.3d 531 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)
State ex rel. Palacios v. Rea
39 P.3d 289 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)