State ex rel. Smith v. Curths

169 P.3d 1277, 215 Or. App. 492, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1454
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 17, 2007·No. 01C10356; A114189·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff-relator appeals a judgment of dismissal of his alternative writ of mandamus and a supplemental money judgment for filing fees that previously had been deferred. We reject without discussion plaintiff-relator’s argument that the court erred in dismissing the writ. Plaintiff-relator argues that the court erred in entering the supplemental judgment without making a determination that he had the ability to pay the fees. The state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard. We accept that concession. See State ex rel Baker v. Cook, 171 Or App 719, 720, 16 P3d 1184 (2000) (in mandamus action, trial court erred in requiring plaintiff-relator to pay previously deferred filing fees).

Supplemental money judgment for filing fees reversed and remanded; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Smith v. Curths, 169 P.3d 1277, 215 Or. App. 492, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1454 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

169 P.3d 1277 (State ex rel. Smith v. Curths) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Baker v. Cook
16 P.3d 1184 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)