State ex rel. Palacios v. Rea
This text of 39 P.3d 289 (State ex rel. Palacios v. Rea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of mandamus. As part of its judgment, the court required plaintiff to pay filing fees of $167, which the trial court had initially deferred pursuant to ORS 21.605(1)(a). Plaintiff challenges both the dismissal and the imposition of filing fees. We reject without discussion plaintiffs arguments as to the merits of the dismissal. However, as defendant concedes, the judgment for filing fees was erroneous. See State ex rel Baker v. Cook, 171 Or App 719, 16 P3d 1184 (2000).
Judgment for filing fees of $167 reversed; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 P.3d 289, 179 Or. App. 431, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-palacios-v-rea-orctapp-2002.