Stanford v. Paris
This text of 698 S.E.2d 654 (Stanford v. Paris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STANFORD, et al
v.
PARIS, et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Donald M. Stanford, Jr., for Stanford, et al.
Lacy M. Presnell, III, Raleigh, for Jean S. Mann, et al.
James K. Pendergrass, Jr., Raleigh, for Edward & Lindsay Mann.
Robert Epting, Chapel Hill, for Orange Water & Sewer.
Kenneth C. Haywood, Raleigh, for Margaret Pless.
Zipporah Edwards, Charlotte, for Margaret Pless, Paris Respondent.
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of November 2009 by Defendant (Orange Water Sewer Authority) to Strike Plaintiff Appellants' Reply Brief:
"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 16th of June 2010."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
698 S.E.2d 654, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 490, 2010 WL 2750745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanford-v-paris-nc-2010.