Stanford v. Paris

698 S.E.2d 654, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 490, 2010 WL 2750745
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 16, 2010·No. 208PA09·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

698 S.E.2d 654 (2010)

STANFORD, et al
v.
PARIS, et al.

No. 208PA09.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 16, 2010.

Donald M. Stanford, Jr., for Stanford, et al.

Lacy M. Presnell, III, Raleigh, for Jean S. Mann, et al.

James K. Pendergrass, Jr., Raleigh, for Edward & Lindsay Mann.

Robert Epting, Chapel Hill, for Orange Water & Sewer.

Kenneth C. Haywood, Raleigh, for Margaret Pless.

Zipporah Edwards, Charlotte, for Margaret Pless, Paris Respondent.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of November 2009 by Defendant (Orange Water Sewer Authority) to Strike Plaintiff Appellants' Reply Brief:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 16th of June 2010."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanford v. Paris, 698 S.E.2d 654, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 490, 2010 WL 2750745 (N.C. 2010).

698 S.E.2d 654 (Stanford v. Paris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Small
698 S.E.2d 654 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2010)