St. Albans Hospital v. City of St. Albans
This text of 176 A. 304 (St. Albans Hospital v. City of St. Albans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a companion to the case of the same title, 107 Vt. 59, 176 Atl. 302. It differs from that case in these respects: The persons relieved by the plaintiff were poor persons and residents of the defendant city; the complaint is brought under P. L. 3923; and the amount claimed is $11.15.
It is plain enough from what we said in the other case, that a recovery could have been had therein for the services and expenses here sued for. But the plaintiff chose to proceed upon the statute above referred to, under which there can be no recovery, for the simple reason that that statute does not provide a remedy by suit.
One who voluntarily aids a pauper is without a remedy against the town. Churchill v. West Fairlee, 17 Vt. 447; Chelsea v. Washington, 48 Vt. 610, 614. There are no equities in pauper matters. They are regulated by arbitrary rules. Waitsfield v. Craftsbury, 87 Vt. 406, 408, 89 Atl. 466, Ann. Cas. 1916C, 387.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 A. 304, 107 Vt. 64, 1935 Vt. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-albans-hospital-v-city-of-st-albans-vt-1935.