Spence v. City of Tuscaloosa

96 So. 464, 19 Ala. App. 231, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 104

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The prosecution against this defendant originated in the recorder’s court of the city of Tuscaloosa, and was for the violation of a city ordinance prohibiting the sale, keeping for sale, or haying in pos-, session whisky or other prohibited liquors. From a judgment of conviction in the recorder’s court, the defendant appealed to the circuit court, and was there tried upon a complaint filed by the áttorney for the city charging the same offense.

From a judgment of conviction in the circuit court this appeal is taken, but no question is presented for the consideration of this court, as no assignment of error is made as the law requires. We must therefore affirm the judgment of the circuit court, for want of assignment of errors. Monroe Washington v. Tuscaloosa (Ala. App.) 96 South. v 464; 1 Hellner v. City of Montgomery, 16 Ala. App. 366, 77 South. 978; Crowder v. City of Montgomery, 16 Ala. App. 686, 81 South. 134.

Affirmed.

FOSTER, J., not sitting.'