Morrow v. Town of Bear Creek

Alabama Court of Appeals

Morrow v. Town of Bear Creek

133 So. 63, 24 Ala. App. 223, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 220

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 17, 1931

Docket6 Div. 790.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 133 So. 63 (Morrow v. Town of Bear Creek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morrow v. Town of Bear Creek, 133 So. 63, 24 Ala. App. 223, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 220 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

This purports to be an appeal from a judgment of conviction in the circuit court, on an appeal to it, rendered on a charge begun against appellant in the mayor’s court of Bear Creek, an incorporated town, for the violation of one of the town’s ordinances.

We will only say that, there being no assignments of error, there is nothing for us to consider, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Spence v. City of Tuscaloosa, 19 Ala. App. 231, 96 So. 464.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

This purports to be an appeal from a judgment of conviction in the circuit court, on an appeal to it, rendered on a charge begun against appellant in the mayor’s court of Bear Creek, an incorporated town, for the violation of one of the town’s ordinances.

We will only say that, there being no assignments of error, there is nothing for us to consider, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Spence v. City of Tuscaloosa, 19 Ala. App. 231, 96 So. 464.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 So. 63, 24 Ala. App. 223, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrow-v-town-of-bear-creek-alactapp-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack