Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/Hellner v. City of Montgomery

Hellner v. City of Montgomery

77 So. 978, 16 Ala. App. 366, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 44
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 22, 1918
Docket3 Div. 206.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 77 So. 978 (Hellner v. City of Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hellner v. City of Montgomery, 77 So. 978, 16 Ala. App. 366, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 44 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

BRICKEN, J.

This defendant was convicted in the recorder’s court of the city of Montgomery for a violation of one of the ordinanoes of the city. On appeal to the circuit court of Montgomery county she was again convicted, from which judgment of conviction this appeal is taken.

On submission here a motion is made to-affirm the case for want of assignments of error, and, as no assignment of error has been made as required by law, the motion is granted, and the judgment of the circuit court of Montgomery county is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parks v. City of Montgomery
92 So. 2d 683 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1957)
Edgil v. City of Carbon Hill
108 So. 355 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Spence v. City of Tuscaloosa
96 So. 464 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
Martin v. City of Birmingham
94 So. 789 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 So. 978, 16 Ala. App. 366, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hellner-v-city-of-montgomery-alactapp-1918.