Hellner v. City of Montgomery

77 So. 978, 16 Ala. App. 366, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 44
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 22, 1918·No. 3 Div. 206.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

BRICKEN, J.

This defendant was convicted in the recorder’s court of the city of Montgomery for a violation of one of the ordinanoes of the city. On appeal to the circuit court of Montgomery county she was again convicted, from which judgment of conviction this appeal is taken.

On submission here a motion is made to-affirm the case for want of assignments of error, and, as no assignment of error has been made as required by law, the motion is granted, and the judgment of the circuit court of Montgomery county is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hellner v. City of Montgomery, 77 So. 978, 16 Ala. App. 366, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 44 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).

77 So. 978 (Hellner v. City of Montgomery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parks v. City of Montgomery
92 So. 2d 683 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1957)
Edgil v. City of Carbon Hill
108 So. 355 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Spence v. City of Tuscaloosa
96 So. 464 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
Martin v. City of Birmingham
94 So. 789 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)