Crowder v. City of Montgomery

Alabama Court of Appeals

Crowder v. City of Montgomery

81 So. 134, 16 Ala. App. 686, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 31

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 21, 1919

Docket3 Div. 342.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 81 So. 134 (Crowder v. City of Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crowder v. City of Montgomery, 81 So. 134, 16 Ala. App. 686, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 31 (Ala. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted in the recorder’s court of the *687 city of Montgomery for the violation of the prohibition law of the city. She appealed to the circuit court, and upon trial in said court was again convicted. The cause is here submitted on motion to affirm for want of assignment of error. No error having been assigned as required by law, the motion is granted, and the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted in the recorder’s court of the *687 city of Montgomery for the violation of the prohibition law of the city. She appealed to the circuit court, and upon trial in said court was again convicted. The cause is here submitted on motion to affirm for want of assignment of error. No error having been assigned as required by law, the motion is granted, and the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 So. 134, 16 Ala. App. 686, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowder-v-city-of-montgomery-alactapp-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack