Spears v. State

123 S.W.2d 674, 136 Tex. Crim. 55, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 15
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 7, 1938·No. No. 19990.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Krueger, Judge.

The conviction is for possession of whisky for the purpose of sale in dry area. . The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for one day and a fine of $100.

The recognizance appearing in this record is wholly insufficient. It does not bind the appellant to do anything. It neither mentions the offense for which he was convicted or the court in which conviction was had, etc. Consequently, the appeal in this case must be dismissed. See Jenkins v. State, 86 Tex. Crim. Rep., 266 (216 S. W., 183) ; Hurt v. State, 92 Tex. Crim., Rep., 347 (243 S. W. 989) ; Wheat v. State, 181 S. W. 727; Art. 831, C. C. P.

The appeal is dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spears v. State, 123 S.W.2d 674, 136 Tex. Crim. 55, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 15 (Tex. 1938).

123 S.W.2d 674 (Spears v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. State
248 S.W.2d 741 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1952)
Weaver v. State
138 S.W.2d 1081 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1940)