Wheat v. State

181 S.W. 727, 78 Tex. Crim. 431, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 8
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 5, 1916·No. No. 3881.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PRENBERGAST, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for selling liquor in non-probibition territory without any license.

The recognizance is fatally defective, as has many times been held by this court. It will, therefore, be necessary to dismiss this appeal.

However, we might say that there is neither a bill of exception nor a statement of facts, and no question raised which can be reviewed in the absence of these. It would, therefore, seem useless to correct the recognizance, as the case shown by this record would necessarily be affirmed if a correct recognizance had been entered into.

The appeal is dismissed.

'Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheat v. State, 181 S.W. 727, 78 Tex. Crim. 431, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 8 (Tex. 1916).

181 S.W. 727 (Wheat v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burlingame v. State
123 S.W.2d 359 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Spears v. State
123 S.W.2d 674 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)