Burlingame v. State

123 S.W.2d 359, 136 Tex. Crim. 4, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 3
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 4, 1939·No. No. 20071.·Published

Opinion

Krueger, Judge.

Conviction is for driving an automobile upon the public highways while intoxicated; punishment is assessed at confinement in the county jail for five days and a fine of $50.

The recognizance appearing in this record is wholly insufficient. It does not bind the appellant to do anything. It neither mentions the offense for which he was convicted or the court in which conviction was had, etc. Consequently, the appeal in *5 this case must be dismissed. See Jenkins v. State, 86 Tex. Crim. Rep., 266 (216 S. W., 183) ; Hurt v. State, 92 Tex. Crim. Rep., 347 (243 S. W., 989) ; Wheat v. State, 181 S. W., 727; Art. 831 C. C. P.

The appeal is dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burlingame v. State, 123 S.W.2d 359, 136 Tex. Crim. 4, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 3 (Tex. 1939).

123 S.W.2d 359 (Burlingame v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wheat v. State
181 S.W. 727 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Jenkins v. State
216 S.W. 183 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Hurt v. State
243 S.W. 989 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)