Jenkins v. State

216 S.W. 183, 86 Tex. Crim. 266, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 402
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 26, 1919·No. No. 5573.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MORROW, Judge.

—The appellant was convicted of aggravated; assault. The only entry we find relating to a recognizance is as-follows -.

“Recognizance fixed at $1,000. Made and executed by Grady Jenkins, N. A. Jenkins, and G. T. Sandige.”

Our statute prescribes the form of recognizance in misdemeanor cases—see Vernon’s Criminal Statutes, vol. 2, art, 919; and art. 920 forbids this court from entertaining an appeal where a recognizance is required unless one is made in substantial compliance with" the form prescribed in the statute. Because the record fails to show a compliance with these statutes the State through the Assist *267 ant Attorney General moves that the appeal be dismissed, which motion we are constrained to sustain.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins v. State, 216 S.W. 183, 86 Tex. Crim. 266, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 402 (Tex. 1919).

216 S.W. 183 (Jenkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burlingame v. State
123 S.W.2d 359 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Spears v. State
123 S.W.2d 674 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Barbuzza v. State
64 S.W.2d 778 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)