Spears v. State

115 S.W.2d 961, 134 Tex. Crim. 451, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 417
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Spears v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 Tex. Crim. 55
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 27, 1938·No. No. 19668.·Published

Opinion

Hawkins, Judge.

Conviction is for selling intoxicating liquor in dry territory, punishment being a fine of $100.00.

It was alleged that the sale was made in Foard County, Texas, and that said county was dry as the result of an election held therein on October 23d, 1937. The averments as to the election, result thereof, and publication, are found in the complaint and information, but no proof supporting such averments is in the record.

It is appellant's position that in the absence of proof that Foard County was dry territory the judgment of conviction can not stand. His contention is supported by Humphreys v. State, 131 Texas Crim. Rep. 383, 99 S. W. (2d) 600; Green v. State, 131 Texas Crim. Rep. 552, 101 S. W. (2d) 241; Gribble v. State, 111 S. W. (2d) 276.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spears v. State, 115 S.W.2d 961, 134 Tex. Crim. 451, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 417 (Tex. 1938).

115 S.W.2d 961 (Spears v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gribble, Jr. v. State
111 S.W.2d 276 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Humphreys v. State
99 S.W.2d 600 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Green v. State
101 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)