South Boston Iron Co. v. United States

118 U.S. 37, 6 S. Ct. 928, 30 L. Ed. 69, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1896
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 19, 1886·No. 220·Published·Cited by 27 cases

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

In Clark v. The United States, 95 U. S. 539, it was decided that, to bind the United States, contracts by the Navy Department must be in writing, and signed by the contracting parties. Such, in the opinion of the court, was the effect of the act of June 2, 1862, 12 Stat. 411, ch. 93, now in force as §§ 3744-3747 and §§ 512-515 of the Revised Statutes. _ An effort has been made in this case to show a contract in writing, but we agree entirely with the Court of Claims that the papers relied on for that purpose are nothing more in law or in fact than the preliminary memoranda made by the parties for use in preparing a contract for execution in the form required by law. This was never done, and, therefore, the United States never became bound. Within a very few days after the memoranda were made the whole matter was abandoned by the Department, and the Iron Company has neither performed any of the work which was referred to, nor has it ever been called on to do so.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

South Boston Iron Co. v. United States, 118 U.S. 37, 6 S. Ct. 928, 30 L. Ed. 69, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1896 (1886).

118 U.S. 37 (South Boston Iron Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Carloading Corp. v. United States
64 F. Supp. 150 (Court of Claims, 1946)
Long Island Railroad v. State
185 Misc. 646 (New York State Court of Claims, 1945)
Rocky Brook Mills Co. v. United States
70 Ct. Cl. 646 (Court of Claims, 1930)
Emery v. United States
13 F.2d 658 (D. Connecticut, 1926)
United States v. Swift & Co.
270 U.S. 124 (Supreme Court, 1926)
Erie Coal & Coke Corp. v. United States
266 U.S. 518 (Supreme Court, 1925)
United States Bedding Co. v. United States
266 U.S. 491 (Supreme Court, 1925)
Durocher v. United States
57 Ct. Cl. 521 (Court of Claims, 1922)
Horton v. United States
57 Ct. Cl. 395 (Court of Claims, 1922)
Belmar Contracting Co. v. . State of New York
135 N.E. 240 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)
Spearin v. United States
51 Ct. Cl. 155 (Court of Claims, 1916)
United States v. P. J. Carlin Const. Co.
224 F. 859 (Second Circuit, 1915)
Ackerlind v. United States
49 Ct. Cl. 635 (Court of Claims, 1914)
New York & P. R. S. S. Co. v. United States
206 F. 443 (Second Circuit, 1913)
United States v. New York & P. R. S. S. Co.
197 F. 995 (S.D. New York, 1912)
Ceballos v. United States
42 Ct. Cl. 318 (Court of Claims, 1907)
Johnston v. United States
41 Ct. Cl. 76 (Court of Claims, 1906)
Sanger v. United States
40 Ct. Cl. 47 (Court of Claims, 1904)
St. Louis Hay & Grain Co. v. United States
191 U.S. 159 (Supreme Court, 1903)
P. H. McLaughlin & Co. v. United States
37 Ct. Cl. 150 (Court of Claims, 1902)