South Bend v. DeHaven
302 U.S. 644, 58 S. Ct. 122
Opinion
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Indiana.
The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, 643; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Collins v. Streitz, 298 U. S. 640. (2) Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., 250 U. S. 394; Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 182; City of Holton v. Kansas State Bank, 300 U. S. 641.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
South Bend v. DeHaven, 302 U.S. 644, 58 S. Ct. 122 (1937).
302 U.S. 644 (South Bend v. DeHaven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District
305 U.S. 564 (Supreme Court, 1938)
Royal Indemnity v. Cardillo
302 U.S. 736 (Supreme Court, 1937)