Royal Indemnity v. Cardillo

302 U.S. 736, 58 S. Ct. 122
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 25, 1937·No. 411·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

302 U.S. 736

58 S.Ct. 122

82 L.Ed. 569

ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation, et al., petitioners,
v.
Frank A. CARDILLO, Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees' Compensation Commission and James S. Rennie.*

No. 411.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 25, 1937

Messrs. Norman B. Frost, Frank H. Myers ad Frederic N. Towers, all of Washington, D. C., for petitioners.

Mr. James E. McCabe, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Rennie.

Messrs. Stanley Reed, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., and Sam E. Whitaker, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Henry A. Julicher, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Frank A. Cardillo.

For opinion below, see Hoage v. Royal Ind. Co., 67 App.D.C. 142, 90 F.(2d) 387.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.

*

Rehearing denied 302 U.S. 778, 58 S.Ct. 270, 82 L.Ed. ——.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Royal Indemnity v. Cardillo, 302 U.S. 736, 58 S. Ct. 122 (1937).

302 U.S. 736 (Royal Indemnity v. Cardillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related