Royal Indemnity v. Cardillo

302 U.S. 736, 58 S. Ct. 122
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 25, 1937
Docket411
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 302 U.S. 736 (Royal Indemnity v. Cardillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Royal Indemnity v. Cardillo, 302 U.S. 736, 58 S. Ct. 122 (1937).

Opinion

302 U.S. 736

58 S.Ct. 122

82 L.Ed. 569

ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation, et al., petitioners,
v.
Frank A. CARDILLO, Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees' Compensation Commission and James S. Rennie.*

No. 411.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 25, 1937

Messrs. Norman B. Frost, Frank H. Myers ad Frederic N. Towers, all of Washington, D. C., for petitioners.

Mr. James E. McCabe, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Rennie.

Messrs. Stanley Reed, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., and Sam E. Whitaker, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Henry A. Julicher, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Frank A. Cardillo.

For opinion below, see Hoage v. Royal Ind. Co., 67 App.D.C. 142, 90 F.(2d) 387.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.

*

Rehearing denied 302 U.S. 778, 58 S.Ct. 270, 82 L.Ed. ——.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 U.S. 736, 58 S. Ct. 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-indemnity-v-cardillo-scotus-1937.