Collins v. Streitz

298 U.S. 640, 56 S. Ct. 835
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 4, 1936·No. No. 921·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of properly presented substantial federal questions. (1) Central Loan & Trust Co. v. Campbell, 173 U. S. 84, 98; Hammond Packing Co. v. Arkansas, 212 U. S. 322, 349; Ownbey v. Morgan, 256 U. S. 94, 111; Washington v. Superior Court, 289 U. S. 361, 366; (2) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tennessee Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; [641] Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 360; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700.

Mr. John W. Ray for appellant. Mr. Thomas A. Flynn for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins v. Streitz, 298 U.S. 640, 56 S. Ct. 835 (1936).

298 U.S. 640 (Collins v. Streitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toole v. Miners Savings Bank
302 U.S. 651 (Supreme Court, 1937)
Keach v. McDonald
302 U.S. 647 (Supreme Court, 1937)
South Bend v. DeHaven
302 U.S. 644 (Supreme Court, 1937)