Keach v. McDonald

302 U.S. 647, 58 S. Ct. 147
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 8, 1937·No. No. 510·Published

Opinion

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Kansas.

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, 643; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Collins v. Streitz, 298 U. S. 640; (2) Iowa Central Ry. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389, 393; French v. Taylor, 199 U. S. 274, 277, 278; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keach v. McDonald, 302 U.S. 647, 58 S. Ct. 147 (1937).

302 U.S. 647 (Keach v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Iowa Central Railway Co. v. Iowa
160 U.S. 389 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Citizens' Savings Bank of Owensboro v. Owensboro
173 U.S. 636 (Supreme Court, 1899)
French v. Taylor
199 U.S. 274 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Hebert v. Louisiana
272 U.S. 312 (Supreme Court, 1926)
Collins v. Streitz
298 U.S. 640 (Supreme Court, 1936)