Keach v. McDonald
This text of 302 U.S. 647 (Keach v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Kansas.
The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, 643; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Collins v. Streitz, 298 U. S. 640; (2) Iowa Central Ry. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389, 393; French v. Taylor, 199 U. S. 274, 277, 278; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
302 U.S. 647, 58 S. Ct. 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keach-v-mcdonald-scotus-1937.