Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District
This text of 305 U.S. 564 (Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from the Supreme Court of California.
The mo[565]*565tion to dismiss the appeal is granted as to the City of Los Angeles, and as to it the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., 250 U. S. 394; Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 182; Williams v. Mayor, 289 U. S. 36, 40; South Bend v. DeHaven, 302 U. S. 644. As to the remaining appellant, further consideration of the question of the jurisdiction of this Court and of the motion to dismiss or affirm is postponed to the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
305 U.S. 564, 59 S. Ct. 104, 83 L. Ed. 356, 1938 U.S. LEXIS 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/los-angeles-v-los-angeles-county-flood-control-district-scotus-1938.