SolarPark Korea Co., Ltd. v. Solaria Corporation
This text of SolarPark Korea Co., Ltd. v. Solaria Corporation (SolarPark Korea Co., Ltd. v. Solaria Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 4 CASE NO. 3:23-cv-01181-AMO 5 SOLARPARK KOREA CO., LTD., JOINT [PROPOSED] SEALING 6 Plaintiff ORDER
7 v.
8 THE SOLARIA CORPORATION, 9 COMPLETE SOLARIA, INC., and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, 10 Defendants. 11
12 13 There are seven pending administrative motions to seal in this case, most of them related 14 to the two substantive motions addressed at the hearing on July 11, 2023. Pursuant to Civil 15 Local Rules 79-5(c)(3), 79-5(f) and 7-11, and after consideration of (1) Defendants The Solaria 16 Corporation and Complete Solaria, Inc.’s (“Defendants”) Administrative Motion to Consider 17 Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed relating to Defendants’ Motion for 18 Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint (Dkt. No. 23); (2) Plaintiff 19 SolarPark Korea Co., Ltd.’s (“SolarPark”) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal SolarPark’s 20 Notice of Motion and Motion For A Preliminary Injunction, Declaration in Support of the 21 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and Identification of Trade Secrets (Dkt. No. 27); 22 (3) Defendants’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal and Consider Whether Another 23 Party’s Material Should be Sealed relating to Solaria’s Opposition to SolarPark’s Motion for a 24 Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 34); (4) SolarPark’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal 25 and Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed relating to SolarPark’s Reply 26 in Support of its Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 40); 27 (5) Defendants’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal and Consider Whether Another 28 Party’s Material Should be Sealed relating to Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss and Motion 1 to Stay (Dkt. No. 31); (6) SolarPark’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal and Consider 2 Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed Relating to SolarPark’s Opposition to 3 Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Stay (Dkt No. 37); and (7) Defendants’ 4 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed relating 5 to Defendants’ Reply in Support of Its Partial Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Stay (Dkt. No. 6 47) and the supporting documents submitted concurrently with the foregoing motions to seal, the 7 Court rules as indicated in the table below. 8 A. Legal Standard 9 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, the party seeking to file a document or portions of it 10 under seal must explain “(i) the legitimate private or public interests that warrant sealing; (ii) the 11 injury that will result if sealing is denied; and (iii) why a less restrictive alternative to sealing is 12 not sufficient.” Civil L.R. 79-5(c)(1). The request must be “narrowly tailored to seal only the 13 sealable material.” Id. at 79-5(c)(3). 14 A party seeking to seal records must provide “compelling reasons” to overcome the 15 “strong presumption in favor of access.” Kamakana v. City & Cty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 16 1178 (9th Cir. 2006); see Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th 17 Cir. 2016). The standard derives from the “common law right ‘to inspect and copy public 18 records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Pintos v. Pac. Creditors 19 Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178). To overcome 20 this strong presumption, the party seeking to seal judicial records must “articulate compelling 21 reasons supported by specific factual findings . . . that outweigh the general history of access and 22 the public policies favoring disclosure, such as the public interest in understanding the judicial 23 process.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178-79 (citations omitted). The party must make a 24 “particularized showing” that “specific prejudice or harm will result” if the information is 25 disclosed. Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th 26 Cir. 2002) 27 It is in the “sound discretion of the trial court” to determine what constitutes a 28 “compelling reason” for sealing a court document. Ctr. for Auto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1097 1 (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 599 (1978)). Compelling reasons 2 justifying sealing court records generally exist when such “court files might . . . become a 3 vehicle for improper purposes” such as “releas[ing] trade secrets,” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179, 4 or “as sources of business information that might harm a litigant’s competitive standing,” Ctr. for 5 Auto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1097; see In re Elec. Arts, Inc., 298 F. App’x 568, 569 (9th Cir. 2008) 6 (sealing trade secret information about “the pricing terms, royalty rates, and guaranteed 7 minimum payment terms” in the parties’ licensing agreement). Additionally, there may be 8 compelling reasons for sealing documents referring to arbitration proceedings where the parties 9 are bound by arbitral confidentiality rules. See, e.g., Serenium, Inc. v. Zhou, No. 20-CV-02132- 10 BLF, 2020 WL 6270928, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2020) (finding that sealing was warranted 11 where the parties were bound by the confidentiality rules of the Beijing Arbitration 12 Commission). 13 B. Rulings 14 Many of the materials and redactions for which these parties seek sealing constitute trade 15 secrets or sources of business information that might harm the litigants’ competitive standing. 16 Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179; Ctr. for Auto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1097. The Court correspondingly 17 notes “trade secret” or “confidential business information” where appropriate to support sealing 18 in the chart below. 19 Other portions of the materials which the parties seek sealing constitute confidential 20 information protected by arbitration rules. See Zhou, 2020 WL 6270928, at *1. The parties here 21 are bound by the rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), which require 22 that all proceedings be kept confidential. See ECF 33 at 3. Specifically, SIAC Rule 39.1 23 provides that “[u]nless otherwise agreed by the parties, a party . . . shall at all times treat all 24 matters relating to the proceedings and the Award as confidential.” Id. SIAC Rule 39.3 further 25 clarifies that “matters relating to proceedings” includes “the existence of the proceedings, and the 26 pleadings, evidence and other materials in the arbitral proceedings,” but excludes matters that are 27 “otherwise in the public domain.” Id. The Court notes “arbitration material” where appropriate 28 to support sealing in the chart below. 1 The Court makes the following rulings regarding the materials requested to be sealed: 2 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 3 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 4 Motion for Extension None. DENIED. 5 of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to 6 the Complaint (“Extension Motion”) 7 (Dkt. No. 22) at p. 2, lines 10-11 8 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. 9 p. 2, line 14 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. 10 p. 3, lines 2-4 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. 11 p. 3, lines 16-17 12 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. p. 3, lines 22-23 13 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. p. 3, line 25 14 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. 15 p. 4, lines 21-22 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. 16 p. 4, lines 25-27 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. 17 p. 5, line 1 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. 18 p. 5, lines 18-19 19 Declaration of Jamie None. DENIED. L. Lucia in Support of 20 Solaria’s Extension Motion (“Lucia 21 Extension Decl.”) 22 (Dkt. No. 22-1) at p.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 4 CASE NO. 3:23-cv-01181-AMO 5 SOLARPARK KOREA CO., LTD., JOINT [PROPOSED] SEALING 6 Plaintiff ORDER
7 v.
8 THE SOLARIA CORPORATION, 9 COMPLETE SOLARIA, INC., and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, 10 Defendants. 11
12 13 There are seven pending administrative motions to seal in this case, most of them related 14 to the two substantive motions addressed at the hearing on July 11, 2023. Pursuant to Civil 15 Local Rules 79-5(c)(3), 79-5(f) and 7-11, and after consideration of (1) Defendants The Solaria 16 Corporation and Complete Solaria, Inc.’s (“Defendants”) Administrative Motion to Consider 17 Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed relating to Defendants’ Motion for 18 Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint (Dkt. No. 23); (2) Plaintiff 19 SolarPark Korea Co., Ltd.’s (“SolarPark”) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal SolarPark’s 20 Notice of Motion and Motion For A Preliminary Injunction, Declaration in Support of the 21 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and Identification of Trade Secrets (Dkt. No. 27); 22 (3) Defendants’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal and Consider Whether Another 23 Party’s Material Should be Sealed relating to Solaria’s Opposition to SolarPark’s Motion for a 24 Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 34); (4) SolarPark’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal 25 and Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed relating to SolarPark’s Reply 26 in Support of its Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 40); 27 (5) Defendants’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal and Consider Whether Another 28 Party’s Material Should be Sealed relating to Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss and Motion 1 to Stay (Dkt. No. 31); (6) SolarPark’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal and Consider 2 Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed Relating to SolarPark’s Opposition to 3 Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Stay (Dkt No. 37); and (7) Defendants’ 4 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed relating 5 to Defendants’ Reply in Support of Its Partial Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Stay (Dkt. No. 6 47) and the supporting documents submitted concurrently with the foregoing motions to seal, the 7 Court rules as indicated in the table below. 8 A. Legal Standard 9 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, the party seeking to file a document or portions of it 10 under seal must explain “(i) the legitimate private or public interests that warrant sealing; (ii) the 11 injury that will result if sealing is denied; and (iii) why a less restrictive alternative to sealing is 12 not sufficient.” Civil L.R. 79-5(c)(1). The request must be “narrowly tailored to seal only the 13 sealable material.” Id. at 79-5(c)(3). 14 A party seeking to seal records must provide “compelling reasons” to overcome the 15 “strong presumption in favor of access.” Kamakana v. City & Cty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 16 1178 (9th Cir. 2006); see Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th 17 Cir. 2016). The standard derives from the “common law right ‘to inspect and copy public 18 records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Pintos v. Pac. Creditors 19 Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178). To overcome 20 this strong presumption, the party seeking to seal judicial records must “articulate compelling 21 reasons supported by specific factual findings . . . that outweigh the general history of access and 22 the public policies favoring disclosure, such as the public interest in understanding the judicial 23 process.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178-79 (citations omitted). The party must make a 24 “particularized showing” that “specific prejudice or harm will result” if the information is 25 disclosed. Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th 26 Cir. 2002) 27 It is in the “sound discretion of the trial court” to determine what constitutes a 28 “compelling reason” for sealing a court document. Ctr. for Auto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1097 1 (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 599 (1978)). Compelling reasons 2 justifying sealing court records generally exist when such “court files might . . . become a 3 vehicle for improper purposes” such as “releas[ing] trade secrets,” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179, 4 or “as sources of business information that might harm a litigant’s competitive standing,” Ctr. for 5 Auto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1097; see In re Elec. Arts, Inc., 298 F. App’x 568, 569 (9th Cir. 2008) 6 (sealing trade secret information about “the pricing terms, royalty rates, and guaranteed 7 minimum payment terms” in the parties’ licensing agreement). Additionally, there may be 8 compelling reasons for sealing documents referring to arbitration proceedings where the parties 9 are bound by arbitral confidentiality rules. See, e.g., Serenium, Inc. v. Zhou, No. 20-CV-02132- 10 BLF, 2020 WL 6270928, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2020) (finding that sealing was warranted 11 where the parties were bound by the confidentiality rules of the Beijing Arbitration 12 Commission). 13 B. Rulings 14 Many of the materials and redactions for which these parties seek sealing constitute trade 15 secrets or sources of business information that might harm the litigants’ competitive standing. 16 Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179; Ctr. for Auto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1097. The Court correspondingly 17 notes “trade secret” or “confidential business information” where appropriate to support sealing 18 in the chart below. 19 Other portions of the materials which the parties seek sealing constitute confidential 20 information protected by arbitration rules. See Zhou, 2020 WL 6270928, at *1. The parties here 21 are bound by the rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), which require 22 that all proceedings be kept confidential. See ECF 33 at 3. Specifically, SIAC Rule 39.1 23 provides that “[u]nless otherwise agreed by the parties, a party . . . shall at all times treat all 24 matters relating to the proceedings and the Award as confidential.” Id. SIAC Rule 39.3 further 25 clarifies that “matters relating to proceedings” includes “the existence of the proceedings, and the 26 pleadings, evidence and other materials in the arbitral proceedings,” but excludes matters that are 27 “otherwise in the public domain.” Id. The Court notes “arbitration material” where appropriate 28 to support sealing in the chart below. 1 The Court makes the following rulings regarding the materials requested to be sealed: 2 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 3 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 4 Motion for Extension None. DENIED. 5 of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to 6 the Complaint (“Extension Motion”) 7 (Dkt. No. 22) at p. 2, lines 10-11 8 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. 9 p. 2, line 14 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. 10 p. 3, lines 2-4 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. 11 p. 3, lines 16-17 12 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. p. 3, lines 22-23 13 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. p. 3, line 25 14 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. 15 p. 4, lines 21-22 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. 16 p. 4, lines 25-27 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. 17 p. 5, line 1 Extension Motion at None. DENIED. 18 p. 5, lines 18-19 19 Declaration of Jamie None. DENIED. L. Lucia in Support of 20 Solaria’s Extension Motion (“Lucia 21 Extension Decl.”) 22 (Dkt. No. 22-1) at p. 2, line 14 23 Lucia Extension Decl. None. DENIED. at p. 2, lines 18-19 24 Lucia Extension Decl. None. DENIED. at p. 2, lines 21-23 25 Lucia Extension Decl. None. DENIED. 26 at p. 3, line 9 Lucia Extension Decl. None. DENIED. 27 at p. 3, lines 14-19 28 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 Lucia Extension Decl. None. DENIED. 4 at p. 3, line 25 to p. 4, line 2 5 Lucia Extension Decl. None. DENIED. at p. 4, lines 5-6 6 Exhibit 1 to the Lucia None. DENIED. 7 Extension Decl. (Dkt. No. 22-2) at p. 2 8 Exhibit 1 to the Lucia None. DENIED. Extension Decl. at p. 3 9 Exhibit 1 to the Lucia None. DENIED. Extension Decl. at p. 9 10 Exhibit 1 to the Lucia None. DENIED. 11 Extension Decl. at p. 10 12 Exhibit 1 to the Lucia None. DENIED. Extension Decl. at p. 13 11 14 Exhibit 1 to the Lucia None. DENIED. Extension Decl. at p. 15 12 Exhibit 2 to the Lucia Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 16 Extension Decl. (Dkt. No. 29), ¶¶ 4-7. Confidential No. 22-3) business 17 information. 18 Exhibit 3 to the Lucia Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. Extension Decl. (Dkt. No. 29), ¶¶ 4-7. Confidential 19 No. 22-4) business information. 20 SolarPark’s Notice of Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 21 Motion and Motion Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, For A Preliminary 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 22 Injunction (“PI Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. Motion”) (Dkt. No. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 23 28) at p. 6, lines 6-8 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 24 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 25 Dkt. No. 35.
28 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 PI Motion at p. 6, Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 4 lines 16-20 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 5 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 6 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 7 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 8 Dkt. No. 35.
9 For information on line 20, see also Dkt. 39, p. 2, line 10 15 and Dkt. No. 35, p. 2, 11 line 23 (SolarPark stating there is “No Basis” to seal 12 similar information in Solaria’s PI Opposition). 13 PI Motion at p. 6, Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. lines 22-23 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 14 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 15 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 16 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 18 PI Motion at p. 6, Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 19 lines 25-26 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 20 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 21 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 22 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 23 Dkt. Nos. 35. PI Motion at p. 6, Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 24 lines 27-28 to p. 7, Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, line 1 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 25 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 26 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 27 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 28 Dkt. No. 35. 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 PI Motion at p. 7, Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 4 lines 2-4 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 5 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 6 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 7 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 8 Dkt. No. 35. PI Motion at p. 7, Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 9 lines 6-7 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 10 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 11 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 12 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 13 Dkt. No. 35. PI Motion at p. 7, line Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 14 13 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 15 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 16 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 17 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 18 Dkt. No. 35. 19 PI Motion at p. 7, Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. lines 15-16 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 20 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 21 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 22 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 23 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 24 PI Motion at p. 7, line Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 18 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 25 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 26 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 27 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 28 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 4 Dkt. No. 35. PI Motion at p. 7, line Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 5 19 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 6 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 7 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 8 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 9 Dkt. No. 35. PI Motion at p. 7, Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 10 lines 26-27 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 11 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 12 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 13 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 14 Dkt. No. 35. 15 PI Motion at p. 8, Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. lines 2-3 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 16 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 17 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 18 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 19 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 20 PI Motion at p. 8, line Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 12 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 21 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 22 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 23 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 24 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 25 PI Motion at p. 12, Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 26 lines 2-4 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 27 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 28 maintained under seal. See, 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 4 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 5 PI Motion at p. 12, Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. lines 9-10 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 6 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 7 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 8 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 9 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 10 PI Motion at p. 12, Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 11 line 11 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 12 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 13 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 14 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 15 Dkt. No. 35. PI Motion at p. 14, Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 16 line 22 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 17 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 18 maintained under seal. See, 19 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 20 Dkt. No. 35. Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 21 PI Motion (Dkt. No. Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 22 28-1) at p. 6, lines 1-2 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 23 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 24 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 25 Dkt. No. 35. 26 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. PI Motion at p. 6, Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 27 lines 5-6 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 28 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 maintained under seal. See, 4 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 5 Dkt. No. 35. Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 6 PI Motion at p. 6, Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 7 lines 7-8 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 8 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 9 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 10 Dkt. No. 35. 11 For information on line 8, 12 see also Dkt. 39, p. 2, line 15 and Dkt. No. 35, p. 2, 13 line 23 (SolarPark stating there is “No Basis” to seal 14 similar information in 15 Solaria’s PI Opposition). Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 16 PI Motion at p. 6, Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, lines 11-12 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 17 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 18 maintained under seal. See, 19 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 20 Dkt. No. 35 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 21 PI Motion at p. 6, Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 22 lines 13-15 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 23 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 24 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 25 Dkt. No. 35. 26 See also Dkt. 39, p. 2, line 27 15 and Dkt. No. 35, p. 2, lines 18-19 (SolarPark 28 stating there is “No Basis” 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 to seal similar information 4 in Solaria’s PI Opposition). Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 5 PI Motion at p. 6, Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, lines 18-21 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 6 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 7 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 8 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 9 Dkt. No. 35. Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 10 PI Motion at p. 6, Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 11 lines 23-25 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 12 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 13 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 14 Dkt. No. 35. 15 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. PI Motion at p. 6, line Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 16 28 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 17 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 18 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 19 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 20 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. PI Motion at p. 7, line Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 21 1 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 22 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 23 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 24 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 25 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 26 PI Motion at p. 7, Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, lines 9-10 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 27 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 28 maintained under seal. See, 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 4 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 5 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. PI Motion at p. 7, line Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 6 12 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 7 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 8 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 9 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 10 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 11 PI Motion at p. 7, Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, lines 19-21 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 12 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 13 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 14 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 15 Dkt. No. 35. Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 16 PI Motion at p. 7, line Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 27 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 17 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 18 maintained under seal. See, 19 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 20 Dkt. No. 35. Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 21 PI Motion at p. 8, Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 22 lines 2-3 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 23 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 24 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 25 Dkt. No. 35. 26 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. PI Motion at p. 8, line Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 27 13 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 28 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 maintained under seal. See, 4 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 5 Dkt. No. 35. Exhibit D to Park Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 6 Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 7 Motion (Dkt. No. 28- 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 5) at p. 2, lines 5-7 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 8 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 9 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 10 Dkt. No. 35. 11 Exhibit D to Park Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 12 Motion at p. 2, lines 8- 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 10 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 13 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 14 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 15 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 16 Exhibit D to Park Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 17 Motion at p. 2, lines 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 11-13 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 18 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 19 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 20 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 21
22 For information on line 13, see also Dkt. 39, p. 2, line 23 15 and Dkt. No. 35, p. 2, line 23 (SolarPark stating 24 there is “No Basis” to seal similar information in 25 Solaria’s PI Opposition). 26 Exhibit D to Park Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 27 Motion at p. 2, lines 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 14-15 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 28 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 maintained under seal. See, 4 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 5 Dkt. No. 35. Exhibit D to Park Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 6 Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 7 Motion at p. 2, lines 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 16-17 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 8 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 9 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 10 Dkt. No. 35. 11 Exhibit D to Park Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 12 Motion at p. 2, lines 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 19-21 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 13 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 14 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 15 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 16 Exhibit D to Park Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 17 Motion at p. 2, lines 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 22-23 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 18 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 19 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 20 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 21 Exhibit D to Park Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 22 Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, Motion at p. 2, lines 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 23 25-27 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 24 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 25 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 26 Dkt. No. 35.
28 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 Exhibit D to Park Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 4 Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, Motion at p. 3, lines 1- 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 5 2 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 6 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 7 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 8 Dkt. No. 35. Exhibit D to Park Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 9 Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, Motion at p. 3, lines 3- 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 10 4 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 11 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 12 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 13 Dkt. No. 35. Exhibit D to Park Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 14 Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 15 Motion at p. 3, lines 5- 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 6 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 16 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 17 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 18 Dkt. No. 35. 19 Exhibit D to Park Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 20 Motion at p. 3, lines 7- 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 8 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 21 No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 22 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 23 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 24 Exhibit D to Park Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 25 Motion at p. 3, lines 9- 27-1), ¶¶ 3-4; to be sealed does not relate objection 26 10 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 27-2), ¶ 3. and does not need to be 27 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 28 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 4 Dkt. No. 35. Solaria’s Opposition None. DENIED. 5 to SolarPark’s Motion for a Preliminary 6 Injunction (“PI 7 Opposition”) (Dkt. No. 35) at p. 1, lines 8 4-5 PI Opposition at p. 2, None. DENIED. 9 lines 2-6, 8-10, 18-26 PI Opposition at p. 3, None. DENIED. 10 lines 3, 18-21, 23 11 PI Opposition at p. 4, Kim Decl. (Dkt. Solaria objects on the basis DENIED. lines 12-15, 17-28 No. 39), ¶¶ 3-4, that the material requested 12 7-8. to be sealed does not relate to a protectable trade secret 13 and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 14 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 15 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 16 17 For information on line 17, see also Dkt. 39, p. 2, line 18 15 and Dkt. No. 35, p. 2, 19 line 23 (SolarPark stating there is “No Basis” to seal 20 similar information in Solaria’s PI Opposition). 21 PI Opposition at p. 4, None. DENIED. lines 2-4, 6-8, 9-12 22 PI Opposition at p. 5, Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 23 lines 15-16, 19-20, 26- No. 39), ¶¶ 3, 6- Confidential 28 8. business 24 information PI Opposition at p. 5, None. DENIED. 25 lines 1-9 PI Opposition at p. 6, Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 26 line 1 No. 39), ¶¶ 3, 6- Confidential 27 8. business information 28 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 PI Opposition at p. 7, Kim Decl. (Dkt. Solaria objects on the basis DENIED. 4 lines 15-16 No. 39), ¶¶ 3, 5- that SolarPark has made Objection 8. this information public. sustained. 5 See, e.g., Dkt. No. 28, p. 9, line 28, through p. 10, line 6 1. 7 PI Opposition at p. 7, Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. lines 16-28 No. 39), ¶¶ 3, 5- Confidential 8 8. business information. 9 PI Opposition at p. 8, Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. lines 4-5 No. 39), ¶¶ 3, 5, Confidential 10 7-8. business 11 information. PI Opposition at p. 8, Lucia Sealing GRANTED. 12 lines 5-6 Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 34-1), ¶¶ 3-6. business 13 information. PI Opposition at p. 8, Lucia Sealing GRANTED. 14 lines 8-11 Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 15 34-1), ¶¶ 3-6. business information. 16 PI Opposition at p. 8, Lucia Sealing GRANTED. line 11 Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 17 34-1), ¶¶ 3-6. business 18 information. PI Opposition at p. 9, Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 19 line 18 No. 39), ¶¶ 3, 6- Confidential 8. business 20 information. PI Opposition at p. 11, None. DENIED. 21 lines 26-28 22 PI Opposition at p. 12, Kim Decl. (Dkt. Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. lines 15-16, 27-28 No. 39), ¶¶ 3-4, that the material requested Trade secret, 23 7-8. to be sealed does not relate objection to a protectable trade secret overruled. 24 and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 25 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 26 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 27 PI Opposition at p. 12, None. DENIED. lines 1-2, 11-15, 19 28 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 PI Opposition at p. 13, Kim Decl. (Dkt. Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 4 lines 1-2, 4-6, 8-10, No. 39), ¶¶ 3-4, that the material requested Trade secret, 13, 15, 17-18, 20-21, 7-8. to be sealed does not relate objection 5 23-28 to a protectable trade secret overruled. and does not need to be 6 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 7 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 8 Dkt. No. 35.
9 For information on line 10, 10 see also Dkt. 39, p. 2, line 15 and Dkt. No. 35, p. 2, 11 line 23 (SolarPark stating 12 there is “No Basis” to seal similar information in 13 Solaria’s PI Opposition). PI Opposition at p. 14, Kim Decl. (Dkt. Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 14 lines 2-4, 6, 11-15, 18- No. 39), ¶¶ 3-4, that the material requested Trade secret, 19, 21-22, 25-26 7-8. to be sealed does not relate objection 15 to a protectable trade secret overruled. 16 and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 17 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 18 Dkt. No. 35.
19 For information on line 12, 20 see also Dkt. 39, p. 2, line 21 16 and Dkt. No. 35, p. 3, lines 20-21 (SolarPark 22 stating there is “No Basis” to seal similar information 23 in Solaria’s PI Opposition). PI Opposition at p. 15, Kim Decl. (Dkt. Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 24 lines 4-5, 11, 14, 15, No. 39), ¶¶ 3-4, that the material requested Trade secret, 25 17-18 7-8. to be sealed does not relate objection to a protectable trade secret overruled. 26 and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 27 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 28 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3
4 For the information on lines 5 11-15, see also Dkt. No. 39, p. 3, line 13 and Dkt. No. 6 35-15 (SolarPark stating there is “No Basis” to seal 7 similar information in Kevin Gibson’s Declaration 8 ISO the PI Opposition at 9 page 7, ¶, 21). PI Opposition at p. 16, Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 10 lines 9-13, 24-25 No. 39), ¶¶ 3, 6- Confidential 8. business 11 information. 12 PI Opposition at p. 19, Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. line 20 No. 39), ¶¶ 3, 5- Confidential 13 8. business information. 14 PI Opposition at p. 18, Lucia Sealing GRANTED. line 28 through p. 19, Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 15 line 2 34-1), ¶¶ 3-6. business 16 information. Vikas Desai’s Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 17 Declaration ISO the PI No. 39), ¶¶ 3, 5- Confidential Opposition (Dkt. No. 8. business 18 35-17) at page 1, ¶ 3 information. 19 Vikas Desai’s Lucia Sealing GRANTED. Declaration ISO the PI Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 20 Opposition at page 1, 34-1), ¶¶ 3-6. business line 22 through p. 2, information. 21 line 2 Suvi Sharma’s None. DENIED. 22 Declaration ISO the PI 23 Opposition at page 1, ¶¶ 4, 5, 6 24 Suvi Sharma’s None. DENIED. Declaration ISO the PI 25 Opposition (Dkt. No. 35-16) at page 2, ¶ 6 26 Suvi Sharma’s Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 27 Declaration ISO the PI No. 39), ¶¶ 3, 6- Confidential Opposition at page 2, 8. business 28 ¶¶ 7, 8, 9 information. 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 Kevin Gibson’s None. DENIED. 4 Declaration ISO the PI Opposition at page 1, 5 ¶ 4 Kevin Gibson’s None. DENIED. 6 Declaration ISO the PI 7 Opposition (Dkt. No. 35-15) at page 2, ¶¶ 4, 8 5 Kevin Gibson’s None. DENIED. 9 Declaration ISO the PI Opposition at page 3, 10 ¶ 8 11 Kevin Gibson’s None. DENIED. Declaration ISO the PI 12 Opposition at page 4, ¶¶ 11,12, 13 13 Kevin Gibson’s None. DENIED. Declaration ISO the PI 14 Opposition at page 5, 15 ¶ 13 Kevin Gibson’s Kim Decl. (Dkt. Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 16 Declaration ISO the PI No. 39), ¶¶ 3-4, that the material requested Trade secret, Opposition at page 5, 7-8. to be sealed does not relate objection 17 ¶¶ 14, 15, 16 to a protectable trade secret overruled. 18 and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 19 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 20 Dkt. No. 35.
21 For information on line 22, 22 see also Dkt. 39, p. 2, line 23 15 and Dkt. No. 35, p. 2, line 23 (SolarPark stating 24 there is “No Basis” to seal similar information in 25 Solaria’s PI Opposition). Kevin Gibson’s Kim Decl. (Dkt. Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 26 Declaration ISO the PI No. 39), ¶¶ 3-4, that the material requested Trade secret, 27 Opposition at page 6, 7-8. to be sealed does not relate objection ¶¶ 16, 17, 18, 19 to a protectable trade secret overruled. 28 and does not need to be 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 4 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 5 Kevin Gibson’s Kim Decl. (Dkt. Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. Declaration ISO the PI No. 39), ¶¶ 3-4, that the material requested Trade secret, 6 Opposition at page 7, 7-8. to be sealed does not relate objection 7 ¶¶ 19, 22, 23 to a protectable trade secret overruled. and does not need to be 8 maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 9 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 10 Kevin Gibson’s None. DENIED. 11 Declaration ISO the PI Opposition at page 7, 12 ¶¶ 20, 21 Kevin Gibson’s Kim Decl. (Dkt. Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 13 Declaration ISO the PI No. 39), ¶¶ 3-4, that the material requested Trade secret, Opposition at page 8, 6-8. to be sealed does not relate objection 14 ¶ 23 to a protectable trade secret overruled. 15 and does not need to be maintained under seal. See, 16 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 17 Dkt. No. 35. 18 Kevin Gibson’s Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. Declaration ISO the PI No. 39), ¶¶ 3-4, Confidential 19 Opposition at page 8, 6-8. business ¶25 information. 20 Kevin Gibson’s Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. Declaration ISO the No. 39), ¶¶ 3, 6- Confidential 21 PI Opposition at page 8. business 22 9, ¶¶ 27, 28, 29, 30 information. Kevin Gibson’s None. DENIED. 23 Declaration ISO the PI Opposition at page 9, 24 ¶ 31 Exhibit 5 to the PI Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 25 Opposition (Dkt. No. No. 39), ¶¶ 3-4, Confidential 26 35-6) 6-8. business information. 27
28 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 SolarPark’s Reply in Lucia Sealing GRANTED. 4 Support of its Notice Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential of Motion and Motion 45), ¶¶ 4-8; See business 5 for Preliminary also Dkt. No. 34- information. Injunction (“PI 1, ¶¶ 3-6. 6 Reply”) (Dkt. No. 41) at p. 2, lines 2-4 7 PI Reply at p. 3, lines Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 8 7-8 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection 9 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 10 4. maintained under seal. See, 11 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 12 Dkt. No. 35. PI Reply at p. 3, lines Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 13 10-11 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection 14 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 15 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 4. maintained under seal. See, 16 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 17 Dkt. No. 35. PI Reply at p. 3, lines Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 18 16-17 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 19 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 20 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 4. maintained under seal. See, 21 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 22 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 23 PI Reply at p. 3, lines Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 23-24 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 24 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 25 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 26 4. maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 27 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 28 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 PI Reply at p. 3, line Park Sealing GRANTED. 4 28 to p. 4, lines 1-4 Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business 5 Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 6 4. 7 PI Reply at p. 4, lines Park Sealing GRANTED. 7-8 Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 8 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. 9 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 4. 10 PI Reply at p. 4, lines Lucia Sealing GRANTED. 11 10-11 Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 45), ¶¶ 4-8; See business 12 also Dkt. No. 34- information. 1, ¶¶ 3-6. 13 PI Reply at p. 4, lines Park Sealing GRANTED. 12-15 Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 14 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business 15 Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3-4 16 PI Reply at p. 4, lines Lucia Sealing GRANTED. 16-17 Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 17 45), ¶¶ 4-8; See business 18 also Dkt. No. 34- information. 1, ¶¶ 3-6. 19 PI Reply at p. 5, lines Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 18-19 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 20 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 21 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 22 4. maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 23 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 24 PI Reply at p. 5, lines Park Sealing GRANTED. 19-20 Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 25 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business 26 Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 27 4. PI Reply at p. 6, lines Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 28 20-21 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection 4 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 5 4. maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 6 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 7 PI Reply at p. 6, line Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 8 23 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection 9 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 10 4. maintained under seal. See, 11 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 12 Dkt. No. 35. PI Reply at p. 7, lines Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 13 7-9 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection 14 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 15 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 4. maintained under seal. See, 16 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 17 Dkt. No. 35. PI Reply at p. 7, lines Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 18 16-20 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 19 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 20 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 4. maintained under seal. See, 21 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 22 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 23 PI Reply at p. 7, lines Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 26-27 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 24 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 25 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 26 4. maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 27 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 28 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 PI Reply at p. 8, lines Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 4 3-6 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection 5 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 6 4. maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 7 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 8 Dkt. No. 35. PI Reply at p. 8, lines Park Sealing DENIED. Not 9 15-16 Decl. (Dkt. No. confidential. 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; 10 Kim Decl. (Dkt. 11 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 4. 12 PI Reply at p. 9, lines Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 1-2 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 13 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 14 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 15 4. maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 16 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 17 PI Reply at p. 9, lines Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 10-11 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 18 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection 19 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 20 4. maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 21 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 22 Dkt. No. 35. PI Reply at p. 9, lines Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis DENIED. Not 23 14-15 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested confidential. 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate 24 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 25 4. maintained under seal. See, 26 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 27 Dkt. No. 35. PI Reply at p. 10, Park Sealing GRANTED. 28 lines 11-12 Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business 4 Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 5 4. PI Reply at p. 10, Park Sealing GRANTED. 6 lines 15-16 Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 7 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. 8 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 4. 9 PI Reply at p. 10, Lucia Sealing GRANTED. lines 25-26 Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 10 45), ¶¶ 4-8; See business 11 also Dkt. No. 34- information. 1, ¶¶ 3-6. 12 PI Reply at p. 11, Park Sealing GRANTED. lines 12-16 Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 13 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. 14 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 15 4. PI Reply at p. 11, Lucia Sealing GRANTED. 16 lines 17-18 Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 45), ¶¶ 4-8; See business 17 also Dkt. No. 34- information. 18 1, ¶¶ 3-6. PI Reply at p. 12, Lucia Sealing GRANTED. 19 lines 7-8 and 9 Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 45), ¶¶ 4-8; See business 20 also Dkt. No. 34- information. 1, ¶¶ 3-6. 21 PI Reply at p. 13, line Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 22 10 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection 23 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 24 4. maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 25 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 26 Dkt. No. 35. PI Reply at p. 13, Park Sealing GRANTED. 27 lines 19-21 Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business 28 Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 4 4. PI Reply at p. 14, Lucia Sealing GRANTED. 5 lines 11-12, 13, and Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 14 45), ¶¶ 4-8; See business 6 also Dkt. No. 34- information. 7 1, ¶¶ 3-6.
8 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. PI Reply (Dkt. No. Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 9 41-1) at p. 4, lines 10- 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection 13 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 10 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 11 4. maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 12 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 13 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. PI Reply at p. 4, line Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 14 14 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection 15 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 16 4. maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 18 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing GRANTED. 19 PI Reply at p. 4, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 16-17 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business 20 Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 21 4. 22 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. PI Reply at p. 4, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 23 19-20 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 24 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 4. maintained under seal. See, 25 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 26 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 27 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing GRANTED. PI Reply at p. 4, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 28 20-22 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 Kim Decl. (Dkt. business 4 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- information. 4. 5 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing GRANTED. PI Reply at p. 4, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 6 23-25 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business 7 Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 8 4.
9 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. PI Reply at p. 5, line 2 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 10 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection 11 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 12 4. maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 13 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 14 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 15 PI Reply at p. 5, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 4-5 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection 16 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 17 4. maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 18 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 19 Dkt. No. 35. Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 20 PI Reply at p. 5, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 6-7 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection 21 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 22 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 4. maintained under seal. See, 23 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 24 Dkt. No. 35. Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 25 PI Reply at p. 5, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 26 12-13 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 27 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 4. maintained under seal. See, 28 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 4 Dkt. No. 35. Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. 5 PI Reply at p. 5, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 18-19 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection 6 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 7 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 4. maintained under seal. See, 8 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 9 Dkt. No. 35. Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis DENIED. Not 10 PI Reply at p. 5, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested confidential. 11 20-21 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret 12 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 4. maintained under seal. See, 13 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; 14 Dkt. No. 35. 15 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. PI Reply at p. 5, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 16 22-24 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. 17 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 4. maintained under seal. See, 18 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 19 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 20 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis GRANTED. PI Reply at p. 5, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested Trade secret, 21 25-27 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate objection 22 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret overruled. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 23 4. maintained under seal. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 24 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 25 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis DENIED. Not 26 PI Reply at p. 6, line 2 Decl. (Dkt. No. that the material requested confidential. 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; to be sealed does not relate 27 Kim Decl. (Dkt. to a protectable trade secret No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- and does not need to be 28 4. maintained under seal. See, 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 e.g., Dkt. No. 34, p. 1, lines 4 17-19 and p. 4, lines 7-8; Dkt. No. 35. 5 See also Dkt. No. 41, p. 8, 6 lines 7-8 (SolarPark does not seek to seal similar 7 information). 8 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing GRANTED. PI Reply at p. 6, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 9 4-7 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. 10 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 11 4. Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing Solaria objects on the basis DENIED. Not 12 PI Reply at p. 6, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. that SolarPark has made confidential. 8-10 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; this information public. 13 Kim Decl. (Dkt. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 28, p. 9, No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- line 25, through p. 10, line 14 4. 4. 15 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing GRANTED. PI Reply at p. 6, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 16 11-14 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. 17 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 4. 18 Park Declaration ISO Lucia Sealing GRANTED. 19 PI Reply at p. 6, line Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 15 and lines 15-17 45), ¶¶ 4-8. business 20 information. Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing GRANTED. 21 PI Reply at p. 6, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 22 18-19 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. 23 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 4. 24 Park Declaration ISO Lucia Sealing GRANTED. PI Reply at p. 6, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 25 19-21 45), ¶¶ 4-8. business 26 information. Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing GRANTED. 27 PI Reply at p. 6, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 22-27 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business 28 Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 4 4. Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing GRANTED. 5 PI Reply at p. 7, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 1-11 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business 6 Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. 7 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 4. 8 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing GRANTED. PI Reply at p. 7, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 9 13-15 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. 10 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 11 4. Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing GRANTED. 12 PI Reply at p. 7, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 17-18 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business 13 Kim Decl. (Dkt. information No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 14 4. 15 Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing GRANTED. PI Reply at p. 7, line Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 16 20 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. 17 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 18 4. Park Declaration ISO Lucia Sealing GRANTED. 19 PI Reply at p. 7, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 23-24 45), ¶¶ 4-8. business 20 information. Park Declaration ISO Park Sealing GRANTED. 21 PI Reply at p. 8, lines Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 22 8-10 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. 23 No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 4. 24 Exhibit A to Park Park Sealing GRANTED. Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 25 Reply (Dkt. No. 41-2) 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business 26 Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 27 4. 28 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 Exhibit B to Park Park Sealing GRANTED. 4 Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential Reply (Dkt. No. 41-3) 40-2), ¶¶ 4-5; business 5 Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. No. 40-1), ¶ 4. 6 Exhibit C to Park Park Sealing GRANTED. 7 Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential Reply P (Dkt. No. 41- 40-2), ¶¶ 3-5; business 8 4_ Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. No. 40-1), ¶¶ 3- 9 4. Exhibit D to Park Park Sealing GRANTED. 10 Declaration ISO PI Decl. (Dkt. No. Confidential 11 Reply (Dkt. No. 41-5) 40-2), ¶¶ 4-5; business Kim Decl. (Dkt. information. 12 No. 40-1), ¶ 4. Defendants’ Partial Lucia Sealing GRANTED. 13 Motion to Dismiss Decl. (Dkt. No. Arbitration and Motion to Stay 31-1), ¶¶ 3-5. confidentiality 14 (“MTD”) (Dkt. No. rules. 15 32) at p. 4, lines 17-19 MTD at p. 4, line 22 Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 16 to p. 5, line 1 No. 33), ¶¶ 3-6. Arbitration confidentiality 17 rules. 18 MTD at p. 5, lines 1-2 Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. No. 33), ¶¶ 3-6. Arbitration 19 confidentiality rules. 20 MTD at p. 9, lines 26- Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 27 No. 33), ¶¶ 3-6. Arbitration 21 confidentiality 22 rules. MTD at p. 12, lines 9- Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 23 12 No. 33), ¶¶ 3-6. Arbitration confidentiality 24 rules. MTD at p. 12, lines Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 25 13-19 No. 33), ¶¶ 3-6. Arbitration 26 confidentiality rules. 27 MTD at p. 16, Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. footnote 3, lines 26- No. 33), ¶¶ 3-6. Arbitration 28 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 confidentiality 4 rules. Exhibit A to the Lucia Sealing GRANTED. 5 Declaration of Jamie Decl. (Dkt. No. Arbitration L. Lucia ISO MTD 31-1), ¶¶ 3-5. confidentiality 6 (Dkt. No. 32-2) rules. 7 Exhibit B to the Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. Declaration of Jamie No. 33), ¶¶ 3-6. Arbitration 8 L. Lucia ISO MTD confidentiality (Dkt. No. 32-3) rules. 9 Exhibit C to the Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. Declaration of Jamie No. 33), ¶¶ 3-6; Arbitration 10 L. Lucia ISO MTD see also Dkt. No. confidentiality 11 (Dkt. No. 32-4) 29. rules. SolarPark’s Lucia Sealing GRANTED. 12 Opposition to Decl. (Dkt. No. Arbitration Defendants’ Partial 46), ¶¶ 4-8; See confidentiality 13 Motion to Dismiss also Dkt. No. 31- rules. and Motion to Stay 1, ¶¶ 2-5. 14 (“MTD Opposition”) 15 (Dkt. No. 38) at p. 5, lines 17-18 and 18-20 16 MTD Opposition at p. Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 5, lines 22-26 No. 37-1), ¶¶ 3- Arbitration 17 6; see also Dkt. confidentiality 18 No. 33, ¶¶ 4-7. rules. MTD Opposition at p. Kim Decl. (Dkt. DENIED. Not 19 5, line 28 to p. 6, line No. 37-1), ¶¶ 3- confidential as 1 6; see also Dkt. it is public. 20 No. 33, ¶¶ 4-7. MTD Opposition at p. Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 21 16, line 28 to p. 17, No. 37-1), ¶¶ 3- Arbitration 22 lines 1-2 6; see also Dkt. confidentiality No. 33, ¶¶ 4-7. rules. 23 MTD Opposition at p. Kim Decl. (Dkt. DENIED. Not 18, line 8 No. 37-1), ¶¶ 3- confidential. 24 6; see also Dkt. No. 33, ¶¶ 4-7. 25 MTD Opposition at p. Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 26 20, line 11 No. 37-1), ¶¶ 3- Arbitration 6; see also Dkt. confidentiality 27 No. 33, ¶¶ 4-7. rules. MTD Opposition at p. None. DENIED. 28 1 Document or Portion Evidence Objections Ruling of Document Sought offered in 2 to be Sealed Support of Sealing 3 MTD Opposition at p. Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 4 20, lines 13-14 No. 37-1), ¶¶ 3- Arbitration 6; see also Dkt. confidentiality 5 No. 33, ¶¶ 4-7. rules. MTD Opposition at p. Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 6 20, lines 14-15 No. 37-1), ¶¶ 3- Arbitration 7 6; see also Dkt. confidentiality No. 33, ¶¶ 4-7. rules. 8 MTD Opposition at p. Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 20, line 16 No. 37-1), ¶¶ 3- Arbitration 9 6; see also Dkt. confidentiality No. 33, ¶¶ 4-7. rules. 10 MTD Opposition at p. Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 11 20, line 18 No. 37-1), ¶¶ 3- Arbitration 6; see also Dkt. confidentiality 12 No. 33, ¶¶ 4-7. rules. MTD Opposition at p. Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 13 20, lines 23-24 to p. No. 37-1), ¶¶ 3- Arbitration 21, line 1 6; see also Dkt. confidentiality 14 No. 33, ¶¶ 4-7. rules. 15 Defendants’ Reply Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. ISO its Partial Motion No. 49), ¶¶ 3-6; Arbitration 16 to Dismiss and see also Dkt. 37- confidentiality Motion to Stay 1, ¶¶ 3-5. rules. 17 (“MTD Reply”) (Dkt. 18 No. 48) at p. 1, line 15 MTD Reply at p. 1, Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 19 line 16 No. 49), ¶¶ 3-6; Arbitration see also Dkt. 37- confidentiality 20 1, ¶¶ 3-5. rules. MTD Reply at p. 8, Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 21 lines 14-17 No. 49), ¶¶ 3-6; Arbitration 22 see also Dkt. 37- confidentiality 1, ¶¶ 3-5. rules. 23 MTD Reply at p. 8, Kim Decl. (Dkt. DENIED. This line 21 No. 49), ¶¶ 3-6; material is 24 see also Dkt. 37- already public. 1, ¶¶ 3-5. 25 MTD Reply at p. 8, Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 26 line 22 No. 49), ¶¶ 3-6; Arbitration see also Dkt. 37- confidentiality 27 1, ¶¶ 3-5. rules. MTD Reply at p. 8, Kim Decl. (Dkt. GRANTED. 28 1 Document or Portion | Evidence Objections of Document Sought | offered in
3 Sealing i 4 1, (3-5. rules. 5 6 Documents filed under seal as to which the administrative motions are granted will 7 remain under seal. See Civ. L. R. 79-5(g)(1). The Court DIRECTS the parties to file public 8 || versions of all documents for which the proposed sealing has been denied within seven days 9 |! from the date of this order. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 || DATED: August 2, 2023 Mack 13 Grech Melfiee 14 United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 35 Case No. 3:23-cv-01181-AM
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
SolarPark Korea Co., Ltd. v. Solaria Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solarpark-korea-co-ltd-v-solaria-corporation-cand-2023.