FEDERAL · 9 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Stay of proceedings where issue therein referable to arbitration
9 U.S.C. § 3
Title9 — Arbitration
Chapter1 — GENERAL PROVISIONS
This text of 9 U.S.C. § 3 (Stay of proceedings where issue therein referable to arbitration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
9 U.S.C. § 3.
Text
If any suit or proceeding be brought in any of the courts of the United States upon any issue referable to arbitration under an agreement in writing for such arbitration, the court in which such suit is pending, upon being satisfied that the issue involved in such suit or proceeding is referable to arbitration under such an agreement, shall on application of one of the parties stay the trial of the action until such arbitration has been had in accordance with the terms of the agreement, providing the applicant for the stay is not in default in proceeding with such arbitration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
U. S. Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. Arguelles
400 U.S. 351 (Supreme Court, 1971)
D.A. Osguthorpe Family Partnership v. ASC Utah, Inc.
705 F.3d 1223 (Tenth Circuit, 2013)
In re Gandy
299 F.3d 489 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Hay Group, Inc. v. E.B.S. Acquisition Corp., Pricewaterhousecoopers L.L.P.
360 F.3d 404 (Third Circuit, 2004)
Superior Edge, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.
964 F. Supp. 2d 1017 (D. Minnesota, 2013)
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Washington
939 So. 2d 6 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2006)
Gloria J. McCaskill v. Sci Management Corporation, Sci Illinois Services, Incorporated, Doing Business as Evergreen Cemetery, Sam Smith
285 F.3d 623 (Seventh Circuit, 2002)
Thi of New Mexico at Vida Encantada, LLC v. Lovato
848 F. Supp. 2d 1309 (D. New Mexico, 2012)
Glencore Ltd. v. Degussa Engineered Carbons L.P.
848 F. Supp. 2d 410 (S.D. New York, 2012)
Bae Systems Aircraft Controls Inc. v. Eclipse Aviation Corp.
224 F.R.D. 581 (D. Delaware, 2004)
Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees
105 F. Supp. 537 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1952)
Mcgovern v. U.S. Bank N.A.
362 F. Supp. 3d 850 (S.D. California, 2019)
Sanders v. Swift Transportation Co.
843 F. Supp. 2d 1033 (N.D. California, 2012)
Community State Bank v. Knox
850 F. Supp. 2d 586 (M.D. North Carolina, 2012)
Jones v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co.
107 F. Supp. 157 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1952)
Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Company v. Kaplan
712 F.2d 270 (Seventh Circuit, 1983)
Maguire Insurance Agency Inc v. Amynta Agency Inc
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Briggs v. Service Corp International
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Reynolds v. Safeway Inc
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(July 30, 1947, ch. 392, 61 Stat. 670.)
Editorial Notes
Derivation
Act Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §3, 43 Stat. 883.
Act Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §3, 43 Stat. 883.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 U.S.C. § 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/9/3.