Smith v. State

69 S.E. 590, 8 Ga. App. 472, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 227
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 3 Ga. App. 803
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 29, 1910·No. 2980·Published

Opinion

Powell, J.-

1. In a prosecution under the Penal Code of 1895, § 438, for carrying liquor to a church, an-instruction to the jury to the effect that if the defendant carried the liquor to a place “in such immediate proximity to the church mentioned in the indictment as to make it readily [473]*473accessible to such persons as bad assembled there and who desired to use the same,” it would be a violation of the law, was not erroneous. Bice v. State, 109 Ga. 117 (34 S. E. 202).

Decided November 29, 1910. Indictment for carrying liquor to church; from Terrell superior court — Judge Worrill. September 17, 1910. James G. Paries, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Laing, solicitor-general, B. B. Arnold, contra.

2. The charge as a whole was fair and not subject to the exceptions taken. The evidence authorized the conviction. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 69 S.E. 590, 8 Ga. App. 472, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 227 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

69 S.E. 590 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bice v. State
34 S.E. 202 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)