Smith v. State

67 S.E. 842, 7 Ga. App. 690, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 467
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 19, 1910·No. 2523·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hill, O. J.

1. The discretion of tlie trial court in refusing to grant a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence will not be disturbed, where the testimony alleged as newly discovered is simply impeaching in character, and where no affidavits are presented showing the good character of the witnesses who will give the new evidence. Fort v. State, 3 Ga. App. 448 (60 S. E. 282) ; 14 Michie’s Dig. Ga. R. 400; Polite v. State, 78 Ga. 347 (3).

2. No error of law in the trial of the ease is complained of, and the evidence supports the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 67 S.E. 842, 7 Ga. App. 690, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 467 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

67 S.E. 842 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ware v. State
89 S.E. 155 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)