Smith v. State
This text of 66 S.E. 964 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. There was no error in overruling the motion for continuance.
2. The charge of the court as to the elements essential to assault with intent to murder was full, fair, and accurate.
3. It is unnecessary to decide whether there was error in the charge as to. the offense of shooting at another, for the defendant was not convicted of that offense.
4. The exception as to the language of the solicitor-general in his concluding argument is not meritorious, in the light of the explanatory note.
5. The exception as to the failure of the judge to rebuke the laughter and applause of the spectators, not being verified by the presiding judge, is not properly before this court for consideration.
6. No reason appears for reversing the judgment of the court below, refusing the defendant a new trial. Judgment affirmed,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 S.E. 964, 7 Ga. App. 334, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-gactapp-1910.