Smith v. State
65 S.E. 300, 6 Ga. App. 577, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 397
Opinion
1. The testimony for tlie defendant relating to the defense of alibi did not at best show the impossibility of his presence at the time of the commission of the crime, and there was no material error in the failure of the court to charge the jury specifically as to the defense of alibi, especially in the absence of a request to give such a charge.
2. The assignments of error of law are without merit, and the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 65 S.E. 300, 6 Ga. App. 577, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 397 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).
65 S.E. 300 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Willingham v. State
215 S.E.2d 521 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Parrott v. State
213 S.E.2d 77 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Touchstone v. State
174 S.E.2d 450 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Cole v. State
11 S.E.2d 239 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Williams v. State
176 S.E. 921 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Staton v. State
163 S.E. 901 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Hammond v. State
134 S.E. 183 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Holliday v. State
98 S.E. 386 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Gibson v. State
93 S.E. 48 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Moore v. State
86 S.E. 822 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Jenkins v. State
78 S.E. 828 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Solomon v. State
73 S.E. 623 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Paulk v. State
70 S.E. 50 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Glover v. State
67 S.E. 687 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)