Smith v. State

467 S.E.2d 510, 266 Ga. 208, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 523, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 55
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 5, 1996
DocketS95A1830
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 467 S.E.2d 510 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. State, 467 S.E.2d 510, 266 Ga. 208, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 523, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 55 (Ga. 1996).

Opinion

Thompson, Justice.

Steven Ray Smith’s convictions for malice murder, armed robbery, and aggravated assault were affirmed by this Court in Smith v. State, 258 Ga. 181 (366 SE2d 763) (1988). The present appeal is from the denial of his motion to correct a void sentence.

1. The assertion that the trial court was without authority to impose a sentence of life imprisonment for armed robbery was addressed and decided adversely to Smith’s position in our recent decision in Echols v. Thomas, 265 Ga. 474 (458 SE2d 100) (1995). See also Worley v. State, 265 Ga. 251 (454 SE2d 461) (1995).

2. Smith’s claim that the trial court was required to impose sentence for felony murder rather than for malice murder was rejected by this Court in the direct appeal of his conviction. Smith, supra at (2). That ruling is binding in any subsequent proceedings in the case and will not be considered for a second time.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
523 S.E.2d 857 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)
Thompson v. State
468 S.E.2d 28 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
467 S.E.2d 510, 266 Ga. 208, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 523, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-ga-1996.