Smith v. State
This text of 467 S.E.2d 510 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Steven Ray Smith’s convictions for malice murder, armed robbery, and aggravated assault were affirmed by this Court in Smith v. State, 258 Ga. 181 (366 SE2d 763) (1988). The present appeal is from the denial of his motion to correct a void sentence.
1. The assertion that the trial court was without authority to impose a sentence of life imprisonment for armed robbery was addressed and decided adversely to Smith’s position in our recent decision in Echols v. Thomas, 265 Ga. 474 (458 SE2d 100) (1995). See also Worley v. State, 265 Ga. 251 (454 SE2d 461) (1995).
2. Smith’s claim that the trial court was required to impose sentence for felony murder rather than for malice murder was rejected by this Court in the direct appeal of his conviction. Smith, supra at (2). That ruling is binding in any subsequent proceedings in the case and will not be considered for a second time.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
467 S.E.2d 510, 266 Ga. 208, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 523, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-ga-1996.