Rowland v. State
This text of 452 S.E.2d 511 (Rowland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Lynn Chaney Rowland, was convicted in Lowndes County Superior Court of malice murder, possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, burglary, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.1 We affirm.
1. When considered in the light most favorable to the verdict, we find that the evidence was sufficient to permit a rational trier of fact to reject Rowland’s claim that she was justified in shooting the victim and instead to find she was guilty of the crimes charged, including murder, beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).
2. We find no merit to Rowland’s second and third enumerations of error, in which she contends that the trial court erred in its charge by implying that the jury was required to convict Rowland either of murder or felony murder and by refusing to give her requested charge on impeachment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
452 S.E.2d 511, 264 Ga. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowland-v-state-ga-1995.