Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Smith v. State

Smith v. State

316 S.E.2d 757, 253 Ga. 169, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 817
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 19, 1984
Docket40788
StatusPublished
Cited by40 cases

This text of 316 S.E.2d 757 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. State, 316 S.E.2d 757, 253 Ga. 169, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 817 (Ga. 1984).

Opinion

Clarke, Justice.

This matter is before the Court on a certified question from the Court of Appeals: Is a timely filed appeal from a judgment of conviction a prescribed means to challenge a guilty plea?

The Court of Appeals has certified the above question to us because of an apparent conflict between that court’s opinion in Fuller v. State, 159 Ga. App. 512 (284 SE2d 29) (1981), and language in Conlogue v. State, 243 Ga. 141 (253 SE2d 168) (1979). In Fuller the appeal was based upon the court’s failure to inform the defendant of its intention to reject the district attorney’s recommended plea bargain and of the defendant’s right to withdraw his plea. The state moved to dismiss, contending a direct appeal does not lie from a judgment based on a guilty plea. The Court of Appeals held that neither a denial of a motion to withdraw the guilty plea nor an adverse ruling on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is a condition precedent to a challenge of a guilty plea on appeal. Unlike Fuller, Conlogue involved a question of voluntariness, and the appeal was taken not directly from the judgment entered on the guilty plea but from a denial of a motion made in a subsequent term of court to withdraw the guilty plea. The Court noted in dicta, “[i]t has been held that a motion for new trial can not be employed as a means of withdrawing a guilty plea; nor can there be an appeal from a judgment entered on a guilty plea.” Id. at 144. We disapprove the statement that there is no appeal from a judgment entered on a guilty plea. Where the question on appeal is one which may be resolved by facts appearing in the record, as in Fuller v. State, supra, a direct appeal will lie.

So answered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ringold v. State
304 Ga. 875 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2019)
Houston v. State
805 S.E.2d 34 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017)
Winfrey v. the State
795 S.E.2d 752 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2017)
Mims v. State
787 S.E.2d 237 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2016)
Jones v. the State
773 S.E.2d 463 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2015)
Juan R. Kennedy v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012
Kennedy v. State
735 S.E.2d 819 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
McKiernan v. State
692 S.E.2d 340 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)
Kaiser v. State
646 S.E.2d 84 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
Orr v. State
575 S.E.2d 444 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)
Cook v. State
496 S.E.2d 785 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Towns v. State
491 S.E.2d 497 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Smith v. State
470 S.E.2d 436 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Caine v. State
467 S.E.2d 570 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Atkinson v. State
466 S.E.2d 32 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
Morrow v. State
463 S.E.2d 472 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1995)
Chives v. State
449 S.E.2d 152 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
Holt v. State
421 S.E.2d 131 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Popoola v. State
401 S.E.2d 344 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Agerton v. State
382 S.E.2d 417 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
316 S.E.2d 757, 253 Ga. 169, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-ga-1984.