Smith v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
JULIUS SMITH, § § Defendant Below, § No. 290, 2025 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 2105000991 (N) § Appellee. §
Submitted: January 23, 2026 Decided: March 26, 2026
Before TRAYNOR, LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices.
ORDER
After consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we
conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of and for the
reasons stated in the Superior Court’s order, dated June 2, 2025, denying the motion
to correct an illegally imposed sentence. Absent plain error, which we do not find
here, we decline to consider the arguments that the appellant raises for the first time
on appeal.1
1 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 8. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Superior Court’s judgment
is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.